American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 133, Issue 3 , Pages 337-340, March 2002

Balloon catheter dilation for treatment of persistent nasolacrimal duct obstruction1

Portions of this material were presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology 1999 Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.

  • Gregg T Lueder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Gregg T. Lueder, MD, St. Louis Children’s Hospital (Room 2s89) at Washington University School of Medicine, One Children’s Place, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA; fax: (314) 454-2368
    • Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and the Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis Children’s Hospital at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Accepted 15 November 2001.

Abstract 

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of balloon catheter dilation of the lacrimal duct for treatment of children with persistent nasolacrimal duct obstruction after previous surgery.

DESIGN: Interventional case series.

METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive children with a history of persistent nasolacrimal duct obstruction following previous surgery were treated with nasolacrimal duct probing with balloon catheter dilation of the distal nasolacrimal duct. Patients were excluded from this study if they had a history of facial trauma, systemic disorders that involved the lacrimal system, or nasolacrimal duct cysts. Outcomes were considered excellent if the patient had complete symptomatic resolution of epiphora and dacryocystitis and normal tear drainage on examination, good if the patient had only minimal residual symptoms or a minimally delayed dye disappearance test, fair if the patient had moderate residual symptoms or delayed tear drainage, and poor if there was no improvement.

RESULTS: Thirty-two children (20 with bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction and 12 with unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction) underwent balloon catheter dilation. Overall results were excellent in 9 (28%) patients, good in 15 (47%) patients, fair in 7 (22%) patients, and poor in 1 (3%) patient. Seven patients had undergone more than one previous procedure. Of these patients, 3 had excellent outcomes, 2 had good outcomes, 1 had a fair outcome, and 1 had a poor outcome following balloon catheter dilation.

CONCLUSIONS: Balloon catheter dilation is a safe and generally effective treatment for children with persistent symptoms of nasolacrimal duct obstruction following previous surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • 1 The author has no financial conflict of interest regarding the subject matter in this manuscript.The author has no proprietary interest in the LacriCATH® catheter.

PII: S0002-9394(01)01403-9

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 133, Issue 3 , Pages 337-340, March 2002