American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 140, Issue 2 , Pages 223.e1-223.e9, August 2005

Survival Analysis of Conjunctival Limbal Grafts and Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Eyes With Total Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Cornea and External Disease Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Accepted 3 March 2005. published online 06 June 2005.

Purpose

To evaluate the survival of conjunctival limbal grafts and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and the influence of several parameters as cause of LSCD, dry eye, keratinization, eyelid abnormalities, HLA compatibility, systemic immunosuppression, and keratoplasty (PKP) on surgical outcome.

Design

Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

Methods

Thirty-three eyes of 31 patients with total LSCD that underwent conjunctival limbal grafts and AMT at the Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo were included in this study. Cumulative graft survival as well as the influence of several variables on surgical outcome was analyzed.

Results

Ten eyes (30%) underwent conjunctival limbal autograft and 23 (70%) underwent conjunctival limbal allograft from living HLA-matched donor. Graft survival was seen in 13 eyes (40%) at 1 year and in 11 eyes (33.3%) at 2 years, with a cumulative survival of 33% after a mean follow-up time of 33 months. Increase in postoperative visual acuity was observed in 20 eyes (60.6%) during this period. Marked impact on graft survival was observed for patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome, dry eye, keratinization, eyelid abnormalities, and allogeneic conjunctival limbal transplantation (independently of HLA compatibility) (P < .05). Preoperative dry eye was the most important prognostic parameter for surgical outcome (P < .001).

Conclusions

Conjunctival limbal grafts associated with AMT are useful for restoring corneal epithelium phenotype in eyes with total LSCD. However, the cumulative survival declines substantially over a 2-year period. Considering all investigated variables, dry eye was the most important prognostic parameter.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(05)00307-7

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.022

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 140, Issue 2 , Pages 223.e1-223.e9, August 2005