American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 3 , Pages 400-404, September 2006

Intraoperative Mitomycin and Corneal Endothelium After Photorefractive Keratectomy

  • Alberto J. Morales, MD

      Affiliations

    • Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico
  • ,
  • David Zadok, MD

      Affiliations

    • Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Rolando Mora-Retana, MD

      Affiliations

    • Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico
  • ,
  • Eduardo Martínez-Gama, MD

      Affiliations

    • Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico
  • ,
  • Nora E. Robledo, OD

      Affiliations

    • Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico
  • ,
  • Arturo S. Chayet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Arturo S. Chayet, MD, Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Padre Kino 10159, Tijuana, BC, 22032, Mexico

Accepted 13 April 2006. published online 23 May 2006.

Purpose

To determine whether there is an increased risk to the corneal endothelium when mitomycin C (MMC) is administered after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Design

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Methods

Corneal endothelium was analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively in 18 eyes of nine patients who were administered either MMC- or balanced salt solution (BSS)–supplemented PRK at Codet Aris Vision, Tijuana, Mexico. After laser ablation, one eye was randomly assigned to intraoperative topical MMC 0.02% treatment for 30 seconds, and the fellow eye (the control eye) was treated in a standard fashion with topical BSS. Preoperative pachymetry and endothelial cell count were performed and compared with postoperative measurements after one month and three months. Main outcome measure studied was endothelial cell loss.

Results

There was no significant difference in the preoperative endothelial cell count between the 2 groups: MMC group 2835 ± 395, control group 2779 ± 492, P = .62. In the control group, at one month and three months the difference in the endothelial cell count was not statistically significant (P = .27, P = .14, respectively). However, in the MMC group the endothelial cell loss was statistically significant: at one month 14.7 ± 5.1%, and at three months 18.2 ± 9.0% (P = .0006, P = .002, respectively).

Conclusions

The use of intraoperative topical MMC 0.02% for 30 seconds after PRK may affect the endothelial cell count.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(06)00502-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.029

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 3 , Pages 400-404, September 2006