Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 149, Issue 5, Pages 768-776.e1 (May 2010)


View previous. 13 of 38 View next.

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Evaluation of the Integrity of Clear Corneal Incisions: A Comparison between 2.2-mm and 2.65-mm Main Incisions

Soon-Phaik CheeabcCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Seng-Ei Tia, Li Lima, Anita S.Y. Chana, Aliza Japad

Accepted 4 December 2009. published online 26 February 2010.

Purpose

To compare wound characteristics and integrity of the 2.2-mm and 2.65-mm clear corneal incisions.

Design

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Methods

Patients undergoing phacoemulsification with lens implant were randomized to receive a 2.2-mm or 2.65-mm temporal clear corneal incision. The incisions were evaluated at 2, 24, and 96 hours for gape and wound architecture using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and for integrity using the Seidel test. Squareness of an incision was calculated (ratio of the incision length to the width).

Results

There were 30 patients in each group. Both incision sizes were watertight, although a mild internal main wound gape was detected on anterior segment optical coherence tomography in 35 eyes (58.3%) at 2 hours. The smaller wound was more square (0.81; standard deviation [SD], 0.11) than the larger wound (0.62; SD, 0.08; P < .001, t test). The mean squareness of eyes without wound gape at 2 hours (0.66; SD, 0.11) was lower than those with a wound gape (0.75; SD, 0.14; P = .008). A squareness factor of 0.72 or more had a positive predictive value for presence of wound gape at 2 hours of 79.3% and a negative predictive value of 61.3%. One side port incision with squareness of 1.39 had a mild leak at 2 and 24 hours, but no gape was seen on anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Conclusions

Both the 2.2-mm and 2.65-mm clear corneal incisions clinically were competent, but the side port incision may leak. A truly square wound has a greater likelihood of being associated with internal wound gape at 2 hours after surgery, especially if the squareness factor is 0.72 or more.

a Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore

b Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore

c Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore

d Division of Ophthalmology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore

Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Soon-Phaik Chee, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Republic of Singapore

PII: S0002-9394(09)00911-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.008


View previous. 13 of 38 View next.

Advertisement