Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages 44-48 (January 2003)


View previous. 8 of 48 View next.

Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale

Jeffrey D Henderer, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Connie Liu, BAb, Muge Kesen, MDa, Undraa Altangerel, MDa, Atilla Bayer, MDa, William C Steinmann, MDac, George L Spaeth, MDa

Accepted 20 August 2002.

Abstract 

Purpose

To report the reliability of the glaucoma disk damage likelihood scale (DDLS) in comparison to the Armaly cup/disk ratio by determining the interobserver and intraobserver agreement for optic disk stereo photographs and the interobserver agreement for in vivo patient measurements of the optic disk.

Design

Observational case series.

Methods

Optic disk photographs: 48 stereo pairs of optic nerve photographs were selected from patients with a spectrum of glaucomatous visual field loss. Two masked observers graded the optic disk photographs three times according to the DDLS and Armaly cup/disk ratio. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated using the test–retest method. Patient measurements: three observers performed in vivo patient measurements on 34 eyes of glaucoma clinic patients and made a single determination of the DDLS stage and Armaly cup/disk ratio, based on the indirect biomicroscopic examination. Level of interobserver agreement was tabulated.

Results

Optic disk photographs: interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the vertical DDLS measurement was greater than for two determinations (clinical impression and measured) of the vertical Armaly cup/disk ratio (interobserver: 85% vs 68% and 74%, respectively; intraobserver grader 1: 97% vs 89% and 80%, grader 2: 99% vs 95% and 89%, respectively). In vivo patient measurements: the interobserver agreement for the DDLS and Armaly cup/disk ratio was similar (70.1% vs 67.6%, respectively).

Conclusions

For the stereo optic disk photographs, the inter- and intra-observer agreement for the DDLS is greater than the Armaly cup/disk ratio. For the in vivo patient measurements, the level of agreement for the DDLS and the Armaly cup/disk ratio is similar.

a William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine (J.D.H., M.K., U.A., A.B., W.C.S., G.L.S.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

b Temple University School of Medicine (C.L.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

c The Tulane Center for Clinical Effectiveness and Prevention, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Tulane University (W.C.S.), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Jeffrey D. Henderer, MD, Wills Eye Hospital, Glaucoma Service, 840 Walnut Street, Suite 1120, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; fax: (215) 928-3903

 This work is supported in part by the Glaucoma Service Foundation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

PII: S0002-9394(02)01833-0


View previous. 8 of 48 View next.

Advertisement