American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 138, Issue 4 , Pages 547-553, October 2004

Corneal pharmacokinetics of topically applied azithromycin and clarithromycin

Ocular Inflammatory Disease Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, and Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA

Accepted 30 April 2004. published online 20 September 2004.

Purpose

To determine corneal levels of topically administered azithromycin and clarithromycin in a rabbit model.

Design

Experimental animal study.

Methods

Corneas of New Zealand albino rabbits were treated with topical azithromycin (2 mg/ml or 4 mg/ml) or clarithromycin (10 mg/ml). Topical azithromycin was prepared from an intravenous solution and topical clarithromycin from a suspension for oral use. All rabbits received one drop every 2 hours on the right eye. Groups of rabbits were treated for the following intervals: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours (four rabbits for each combination of time point, drug, and dose). Corneal tissue was removed 1 hour after the last application. To investigate stability of tissue azithromycin levels, an additional group of four rabbits was treated for 24 hours, but corneal tissue was not removed until 24 hours later. Samples were homogenized, and drug concentrations were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis and bioactivity assay.

Results

Corneal concentrations of azithromycin increased with drug dosage and duration of application. Rabbits treated with azithromycin tolerated the drug well without signs of irritation. Clarithromycin was undetectable in corneal tissue by HPLC and bioactivity assay for all rabbits. Some rabbits treated with clarithromycin had signs of ocular surface irritation.

Conclusion

Measurable concentrations of azithromycin are achieved in corneal tissue after topical application in a rabbit model, and the drug is well tolerated. Azithromycin may be a useful antibiotic for the topical treatment of human corneal infections, but clarithromycin, in currently available formulations, may not be effective because of poor tissue penetration.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NY (G.N.H., B.J.M.), the Jules Stein Eye Institute Card Family Research Fund and Wasserman Fund (B.J.M.), the Skirball Foundation, Los Angeles, CA (G.N.H.), and the David May II Endowed Professorship (G.N.H.). Dr. Holland is a recipient of a Research to Prevent Blindness, Physician-Scientist Award.

PII: S0002-9394(04)00509-4

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.071

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 138, Issue 4 , Pages 547-553, October 2004