American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 138, Issue 6 , Pages 952-958, December 2004

Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment

  • Alexandros N. Stangos, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Ioannis K. Petropoulos, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Catherine G. Brozou, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Anastasios D. Kapetanios, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Andrew Whatham, DPHIL

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ,
  • Constantin J. Pournaras, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Constantin J. Pournaras, MD, Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, 22 Rue Alcide-Jentzer, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland; fax: + 41 22 3828421

Accepted 29 June 2004. published online 21 October 2004.

Purpose

To compare primary pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone vs vitrectomy with an encircling scleral buckling procedure for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment (PsRD).

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study.

Methods

All 71 eyes of 68 consecutive patients with PsRD presented to our service between 1998 and 2002 were offered either vitrectomy alone (group-A) or vitrectomy in combination with encircling scleral buckling procedure (group-B). Preoperative and postoperative patient characteristics were recorded in detail. Main outcome measures were reattachment with a single surgery, visual acuity, and reattachment surgery-related complications.

Results

Retina reattachment with a single surgery was achieved in 97.78% in group A and 92.31% in group B. Visual acuity improved by 3 or more lines in 60% in group A and 69% in group B. Mean postoperative refractive error change (spherical) was −0.05 diopters in group A and −1.43 diopters in group B. Postoperative intraocular pressure on long-term follow-up was elevated in 4.44% (group A) and 34.61% (group B). Average follow-up was 12.45 months (±5.23 SD) ranging from 9 to 40 months. We detected additional breaks intraoperatively in 54.9% of cases (both groups).

Conclusions

Vitrectomy is an effective initial treatment for PsRD, whereas the benefit of an additional encircling buckling procedure is questionable.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(04)00836-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.086

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 138, Issue 6 , Pages 952-958, December 2004