American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 235-241, February 2005

Primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve in bioceramic orbital implants

  • Shu Lang Liao, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Shu Lang Liao, MD, 7, Chung-Shan South Rd. Taipei, Taiwan. Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan 100; fax: 886-2-23412875
  • ,
  • Mei Ju Shih, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Luke L.-K. Lin, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Accepted 27 July 2004. published online 10 January 2005.

Purpose

To study a new surgical option of primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve into the Bioceramic implant during enucleation or evisceration.

Design

Retrospective, observational case series.

Methods

A standard enucleation or evisceration was performed, followed by the preplacement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve into the Bioceramic implant. Care must be taken to ensure the sleeve has been positioned centrally when the implant is put inside the orbital socket. Complications such as sleeve exposure, Bioceramic implant exposure, and infection were closely observed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were treated in above fashion with five enucleation and 22 evisceration procedures. Five of the sleeves have exposed spontaneously during 1 to 4 months after original surgery. They had no further complication, except for one sleeve around which there were visible Bioceramic spicules attributable to long-term corticosteroid usage. The remaining 22 sleeves that did not spontaneously expose pursued secondary exposure of the sleeve and peg insertion by the conjunctival cutdown procedure 3 months postoperatively. One sleeve was medially positioned far away from the implant center. Re-insertion of new sleeve and peg was scheduled 2 weeks later. One additional sleeve was obliquely positioned after conjunctival cutdown procedure. Fortunately, all 27 patients were successfully fitted with a peg-coupled prosthesis with good motility.

Conclusions

Primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve into the Bioceramic implants has several advantages, including high patient acceptance, technical simplicity, and an office-based conjunctival cutdown pegging procedure. By avoiding the expense of postoperative imaging studies and additional prosthetic modification, a more rapid and efficient rehabilitation is possible.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(04)00939-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.051

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 235-241, February 2005