Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage
Purpose
Several cross-sectional studies have demonstrated the capability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to detect glaucomatous changes. OCT enables posterior pole scanning of three regions: macula, peripapillary, and optic nerve head (ONH). This study compared the ability of each region to detect glaucomatous damage.
Design
Retrospective observational cross-sectional study.
Methods
The study included 37 normal (37 subjects) and 37 glaucomatous eyes (26 subjects) that had comprehensive ocular examination, reliable and reproducible Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm standard 24–2 perimetry, and Stratus OCT scanning of macula, peripapillary, and ONH regions on the same visit. Optical nerve head (ONH) appearance did not form part of the inclusion criteria. The main outcome measure, was area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AROCs) that was calculated for each scanning region for distinguishing between normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Results
The highest AROCs for distinguishing between groups were for ONH parameters (rim area = 0.97, horizontal integrated rim width = 0.96, vertical integrated rim area = 0.95) and peripapillary nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness (0.94) followed by macular volume and thickness (both 0.80). A statistically significant difference existed in ONH and NFL AROCs when compared with macular AROCs (P ≤ .007, for both)
Conclusions
OCT ONH and NFL parameters provided similar discrimination capabilities between healthy eyes and those of glaucoma patients and superior discrimination capabilities when compared with macular parameters.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported in part by grants NIH R01-EY13178-4, RO1-EY11289-16, and P30-EY13078.Dr. Schuman is an inventor of optical coherence tomography.
PII: S0002-9394(04)01005-0
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.036
© 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
