American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 247-252, February 2005

Optic disk ovality as an index of tilt and its relationship to myopia and perimetry

Presented at ARVO, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, April 24–29, 2004.

  • Eugene Tay, MRCS(Ed), MRCOphth

      Affiliations

    • Moorfields Eye Hospital, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England
  • ,
  • Steve K. Seah (FRCS(Ed), FRCOphth)

      Affiliations

    • Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
  • ,
  • Siew-Pang Chan, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute, Singapore
  • ,
  • Albert T.H. Lim (FRCS(Ed))

      Affiliations

    • Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute, Singapore
    • Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
  • ,
  • Sek-Jin Chew, PhD (FRCS(Ed))

      Affiliations

    • Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
  • ,
  • Paul J. Foster, PhD (FRCS(Ed))

      Affiliations

    • Moorfields Eye Hospital, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England
    • Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England
    • Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
  • ,
  • Tin Aung (FRCS(Ed), FRCOphth)

      Affiliations

    • Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
    • Defence Medical and Environmental Research Institute, Singapore
    • National University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Dr Tin Aung, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11, Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751; fax: (+65) 62263395

Accepted 30 August 2004. published online 10 January 2005.

Purpose

To examine the association of optic disk ovality with myopic refractive error, axial length, and the visual field.

Design

Prospective observational case series.

Methods

The study included 150 randomly recruited male subjects with myopia. In all cases, one eye was randomly selected, and subjective refraction, slit-lamp examination, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, A-scan ultrasonography, funduscopy, and color optic disk stereo photography were performed. Disk ovality was assessed using the ratio of minimum to maximum disk diameter (index of tilt). A ratio of ≤ 0.8 was considered as significant disk tilt. Visual fields were tested using static automated threshold perimetry with two methods of optical correction: trial lenses and contact lenses.

Results

Of the total sample, 137 subjects completed the study. Mean age was 21.2 ± 1.1 year, and mean spherical equivalent was -6.36 ± 3.56 diopters. Mean ovality ratio was 0.83 ± 0.09; 55 subjects (40.2%) had significant tilted optic disks. Greater optic disk ovality (tilt) correlated with greater myopia (P = .009) and longer axial length (P = .009); 95.6% of subjects had normal visual fields with both methods of optical correction. Using multiple linear regression analysis, greater tilt was independently related to a higher mean defect on testing with trial lenses (P < .01).

Conclusions

Increased optic disk tilt was associated with higher myopia and reduced sensitivity on field testing. These factors are important in the assessment of glaucoma in patients with myopia.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was supported by a grant from the Defence Medical Research Institute, Singapore.

PII: S0002-9394(04)01089-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.076

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 247-252, February 2005