American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 1 , Pages 168-178, January 2005

Long-term histopathologic findings in human corneal wounds after refractive surgical procedures

  • Daniel G. Dawson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • ,
  • Henry F. Edelhauser, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • ,
  • Hans E. Grossniklaus, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Hans E. Grossniklaus, MD, L.F. Montgomery Laboratory, BT 428, Emory Eye Center, 1365-B Clifton Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30322; fax (404) 778-2244

Accepted 30 August 2004. published online 06 December 2004.

Objective

To describe the human corneal histopathology after laser in situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic keratoplasty, clear corneal refractive lens surgery, conductive keratoplasty, and intrastromal corneal ring segment placement.

Design

Retrospective histopathologic study and selected literature review.

Methods

Ninety-four postmortem corneas from 49 patients and 10 corneal button specimens from 6 patients with previous refractive surgery were collected from eye banks and refractive surgeons in North America. This observational case series evaluated the pathologic findings in the wounds of these corneas in the context of previous studies.

Results

Three histopathologic types of corneal wound-healing responses were present in corneas after refractive surgery. The first was an epithelial cell modification that reestablished a smooth anterior corneal surface through basal epithelial cell hypertrophy, by epithelial hyperplasia, or both. The second was the production of a hypercellular fibrotic stromal scar, and the third was the production of a hypocellular primitive stromal scar. Although only the hypercellular fibrotic stromal scar could be identified on gross examination, all three wound responses were identified with light, electron, and immunofluorescence microscopy. Confocal microscopy also identified these three processes but with less detail and resolution.

Conclusion

Understanding the locations, clinical appearance, and functional attributes of these wound-healing responses will help guide evolving techniques or adjunctive treatments.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by National Eye Institute grants EY-00933, P30-EY06360, and T32-EY07092 and by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.

PII: S0002-9394(04)01091-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.078

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 1 , Pages 168-178, January 2005