American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 271-279, February 2005

Vision-related quality of life in patients suffering from age-related macular degeneration

  • Gilles H. Berdeaux, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Alcon Research Ltd, Rueil-Malmaison, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Gilles H. Berdeaux, MD, PhD, Alcon Research, 4 rue Henri Sainte Claire Deville, 92563 Rueil Malmaison Cedex, fax: +33-1-47-10-48-41
  • ,
  • Jean-Phillipe Nordmann, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre Hospitalier des XV–XX, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Emma Colin, BA HS

      Affiliations

    • Mapi Values, Macclesfield, The United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Benoit Arnould, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Mapi Values, Lyon, France.

Accepted 13 September 2004. published online 01 November 2004.

Purpose

To evaluate the relative impact of best and worst eye on vision-related quality of life in patients suffering from age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design

Quality of life and visual acuity data were collected at baseline during a randomized clinical trial.

Methods

setting: Multicenter (11 centers), international study. patients: One hundred fourteen patients with a diagnosis of exudative AMD and primary or recurrent subfoveal neovascular membrane (greatest linear dimension of lesion ≤5400 μm; ≥50% of the total lesion was choroidal neovascularization (CNV); classic component of the total CNV ≥ 1.0 mm2). All patients were over age 50 years, of any race, either sex. intervention or observation procedure: NEI-VFQ-39 questionnaire administered to patients at home by trained telephone interviewers. main outcome measures: ETDRS visual acuity (VA) was measured in both eyes separately. Vision-related quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-39. An analysis of variance was performed on the NEI-VFQ scores, including best eye VA (VA > 20/40 vs VA ≤ 20/40), worst eye VA (VA > 20/200 vs VA ≤ 20/200), and the interaction between the two as independent variables.

Results

Best eye VA was 0.34 on average, with VA > 20/40 in 43.0% of patients. Worst eye VA was 0.85 on average, with VA > 20/200 in 32.5% of patients. VA was not linked to general health and ocular pain scores. General Vision, Near Activities, Distance Vision, Driving, Mental Health, Role Difficulties, Dependency, Peripheral Vision, and the Global NEI-VFQ scores were affected by both best eye VA and worst eye VA.

Conclusion

In the study sample, worst eye VA (≤20/200) and best eye VA (≤20/40) contributed independently to vision-related QoL. These results suggest that preserving a minimal visual acuity in the worst eye may contribute to vision-related quality of life.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The work was supported by an unrestricted grant from Alcon Research Ltd, Fort Worth, Texas, and Alcon France, Rueil-Malmaison, France. The work was conducted according to the local laws and was contracted to Mapi Values, Lyon, France.

PII: S0002-9394(04)01119-5

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.09.028

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 271-279, February 2005