American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 4 , Pages 653-657, April 2005

Multiple laser treatments for macular edema attributable to branch retinal vein occlusion

  • Erica Esrick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Manju L. Subramanian, MD

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Manju L Subramanian, MD, 50 Winchester Street, No. 205, Brookline, MA 02114
  • ,
  • Jeffrey S. Heier, MD

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Anand K. Devaiah, MD

      Affiliations

    • Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Trexler M. Topping, MD

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Albert R. Frederick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Michael G. Morley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts

Accepted 4 November 2004. published online 01 March 2005.

Purpose

To report the visual outcome of multiple laser treatments for macular edema attributable to branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVO) and to determine if any prognostic factors exist for improvement.

Design

Retrospective chart review.

Methods

A private practice with four vitreoretinal surgeons performed laser treatments on 88 eyes of 88 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO from 1984 to 2003. Mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuities were collected after each laser treatment. Final visual acuities were also documented.

Results

All 88 patients received at least one laser treatment, and 46 patients of the initial 88 underwent multiple treatments. Overall, forty-one (46.6%) of the total 88 patients improved by 2 or more lines, whereas 33 patients (37.5%) were within 1 line of the preoperative vision, and 14 patients (15.9%) worsened by 2 or more lines. The mean final visual improvement was 0.92 lines for all 88 patients. The group of patients that responded favorably to the first laser treatment (n = 37) showed an overall improvement of 3.5 lines. However, patients who responded poorly to the first laser treatment resulted in an overall worsening of vision by 0.96 lines.

Conclusions

Our study found that multiple laser treatments can improve visual acuity and resolve macular edema and that each additional laser treatment gives a patient a modest chance of visual improvement. A positive or stable visual response to first laser treatment portends a favorable prognosis with subsequent laser treatments.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Center for Eye Research and Education supported this project.

PII: S0002-9394(04)01374-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.11.011

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 4 , Pages 653-657, April 2005