American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 4 , Pages 624-630, April 2005

Intraobserver repeatability of macula measurements by confocal scanning laser tomography

Data from this study were presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, April 2004.

VEIC, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

Accepted 29 November 2005. published online 18 February 2005.

Purpose

To assess the repeatability of macula measurements provided by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II) in normal subjects, patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), and patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

Design

Prospective, observational case.

Methods

setting: Institutional-based study. patient population: Ten normal eyes, 14 eyes with DME, and 14 eyes with CNV. observational procedure: Three scans within a single day. An additional three scans of each of the 10 normal eyes on a different day. main outcome measures: Bland and Altman analysis for a 0.25 mm, 0.50 mm, and 0.75 mm radius circle.

Results

Variability and repeatability of the measurements were not related to circle size for either group of patients. Coefficient of variability values of the normal group and a 0.50-mm radius circle were 17%, 5.7%, and 6.1% for mean surface height, signal width, and edema index, respectively. The corresponding values were 15.6%, 10%, and 10% for the DME group, and 10.5%, 7.4%, and 8.5% for the CNV group. The 95% confidence interval of the difference between single observations across days of the normal group was ±106 μm, ±80 μm, and ±0.10 for mean surface height, signal width, and edema index, respectively. When three scans were combined, the corresponding values were ±61.5 μm, ±46.7 μm, and ±0.06.

Conclusions

The repeatability and variability of measurements of normal subjects, patients with DME, and patients with CNV were determined. Differences between the three groups exist and are important for diagnosing a pathologic condition or measuring the effect of various treatments.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(04)01462-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.11.063

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 4 , Pages 624-630, April 2005