American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 5 , Pages 820-825, May 2005

Comparing Age-related Macular Degeneration Phenotype in Probands From Singleton and Multiplex Families

  • Eric A. Postel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Eric A. Postel, MD, Duke University Eye Center, Box 3802, Durham, NC 27710
  • ,
  • Anita Agarwal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Nashville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Silke Schmidt, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Center for Human Genetics, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Yu-Ti R. Fan, MS

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Center for Human Genetics, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • William K. Scott, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Center for Human Genetics, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • John R. Gilbert, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Center for Human Genetics, Durham, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Jonathan L. Haines, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Center for Human Genetics Research, Nashville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Margaret A. Pericak-Vance, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Center for Human Genetics, Durham, North Carolina

Accepted 9 December 2004. published online 18 March 2005.

Purpose

To compare age-related macular degeneration (AMD) phenotype between probands in singleton and multiplex families to determine whether data from these two groups may be combined for consolidated genetic analyses.

Design

Retrospective case-control study.

Methods

Individuals 55 years of age or older with AMD were identified. Complete histories and examinations were recorded, 35-mm fundus photographs obtained, and macular findings graded. Detailed information was recorded, including the presence of extramacular and peripheral drusen, peripheral reticular pigmentary change, posterior vitreous detachment, and iris color. Comparisons were performed between probands from singleton and multiplex families.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in grade between the 411 singleton and 125 multiplex probands (P = .52), and the distribution of grades was similar between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was found between proband groups with respect to the presence or extent of small (P = .48), intermediate (P = .72), and large drusen (P = .74) and retinal pigment epithelium hyper- (P = .76) and hypopigmentation (P = .55); in the presence or grade of peripheral reticular pigment change; the presence of geographic atrophy in exudative disease, extramacular drusen, or posterior vitreous detachment; lens status; iris color; visual acuity; intraocular pressure; optic nerve cupping; and body mass index. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was noted in the presence of peripheral drusen (P = .0001).

Conclusions

Singleton and multiplex AMD probands share a similar phenotype. This suggests that multiplex and singleton data can be combined for consolidated genetic analyses.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by NIH grant U10 EY12118.

PII: S0002-9394(04)01516-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.029

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 139, Issue 5 , Pages 820-825, May 2005