American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 140, Issue 2 , Pages 173.e1-173.e13, August 2005

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis With Two Different Lasers

  • Michael D. Twa, OD, MS

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • ,
  • Richard G. Lembach, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • ,
  • Mark A. Bullimore, MCOptom, PhD

      Affiliations

    • College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • ,
  • Cynthia Roberts, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
    • Department of Bioengineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Cynthia Roberts, PhD, The Ohio State University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 270 Bevis Hall, 1080 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210

Accepted 10 March 2005. published online 13 June 2005.

Purpose

To compare optical quality, visual function, corneal shape, ocular wavefront aberrations, and patient-reported symptoms and satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with two different excimer lasers.

Design

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

Methods

In an institutional practice setting, 60 eyes of 30 patients with low to moderate myopia were randomized to receive LASIK in one eye with the Technolas 217A; the other eye was treated with the VISX S3. Patients were followed for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

Results

At 6 months, the mean best-spectacle corrected high contrast visual acuity was similar between the two treatment groups: mean difference (95% confidence interval) was −0.01 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (−0.03 to +0.01 logMAR). Uncorrected visual acuity differences were also not significant. The difference in residual spherical equivalent subjective refractive error between treatment groups was −0.15 diopter (−0.34 to +0.05 diopter). Spherical aberration increased in both groups after treatment, and the change in root mean square (RMS) ocular wavefront error was greater in the VISX group by +0.07 μm (+0.03 to +0.11 μm). After LASIK, corneal curvature was steeper in the midperipheral region among VISX-treated eyes by +1.39 diopters (+2.06 to +0.72 diopters). There were no patient-reported differences in satisfaction between eyes.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in visual acuity or refractive outcomes attributed to either laser under any of the conditions measured. There was also no significant difference in patient-reported symptoms, satisfaction with treatment, or eye preference associated with either laser. Additional study is needed to establish the importance of differences in higher-order optical aberrations and corneal shape that we observed in these two treatment groups.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grants EY13359 and EY16225 (M.D.T.) and EY12952 (M.A.B.) from the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; an Ocular Sciences Ezell Fellowship from the American Optometric Foundation (M.D.T.); and a Bausch & Lomb Clinical Trial funded by Bausch & Lomb Inc, Rochester, New York (C.R.).

PII: S0002-9394(05)00332-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.036

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 140, Issue 2 , Pages 173.e1-173.e13, August 2005