American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 67-70, January 2006

Higher-order Aberrations in Children

The Childrens University Hospital, University College, Dublin, Ireland.

Accepted 10 August 2005. published online 31 October 2005.

Purpose

To quantify and characterize higher order aberrations in children and to investigate the influence of refractive error and cycloplegia.

Design

Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods

setting: Clinical practice. patients: One hundred sixty-two eyes of 82 children were examined. The mean age of the children was 6.7 years (range, 4 to 14 years), and the mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent was 2.39 ± 3.35 diopters (range, −8.98 to +8.45 diopters). Aberrometry was performed with a wavefront analyzer (after cycloplegia and mydriasis with cyclopentolate 1%). Aberrometry was also conducted on a subgroup of 52 eyes of 27 children, both before and 30 minutes after the instillation of cyclopentolate 1% to investigate the effect of paralysis of accommodation.

Results

Mean root mean square values of total-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-order aberrations were 0.37 ± 0.13 μm, 0.23 ± 0.12 μm, 0.16 ± 0.11 μm, and 0.08 ± 0.12 μm, respectively. Mean root mean square values of total coma (Z3−1, Z31, Z5−1, Z51) and total trefoil (Z3−3, Z33, Z5−3, Z53) were 0.27 ± 0.31 μm and 0.21 ± 0.29 μm, respectively. Myopes had statistically significant greater levels of total (P = .005) and fourth order (P = .002) aberrations and Zernicke terms (Z3−3, Z3−1, Z33, Z4−4, and Z42) compared with hyperopes. Cycloplegia had minimal influence on higher-order aberrations.

Conclusion

Significant levels of higher-order aberrations were found in these children. They were influenced by refractive error, because myopes had significantly greater levels compared with hyperopes. Paralysis of accommodation with cyclopentolate appeared to have little effect on higher-order aberrations.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(05)00914-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.031

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 67-70, January 2006