American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 44-53.e1, January 2006

Clinical Analysis of the Effect of Intraarterial Cytoreductive Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Lacrimal Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

  • David T. Tse, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to David T. Tse, MD, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL 33136; fax: (305) 326-6443
  • ,
  • Pasquale Benedetto, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • ,
  • Sander Dubovy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • ,
  • Joyce C. Schiffman, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • ,
  • William J. Feuer, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Accepted 25 August 2005. published online 11 November 2005.

Purpose

To determine the effect of intraarterial cytoreductive chemotherapy (IACC) as an adjunct to conventional surgery and radiation therapy for lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

Design

A retrospective, comparative, interventional case series.

Methods

setting: Institutional. patient population: Nine consecutive patients with lacrimal gland ACC were treated with IACC, followed by orbital exenteration and chemoradiotherapy. This case series was compared with a series of seven patients treated by conventional local therapies in the same institution. intervention procedure: Clinical records, imaging studies, histologic sections, and archival specimens from all 16 patients were reviewed. Information analyzed included site of disease, histologic characteristics, extent of disease, incidence of locoregional recurrence or distant metastases, and disease-free survival and overall survival time. main outcome measure: The effect of IACC was assessed by the radiographic and histologic response and survival outcome in comparison to a historical cohort of patients managed by conventional local therapies.

Results

The difference between the carcinoma cause-specific death rate of the study group versus conventional treatment was significant (P = .029, log rank test). The cumulative 5-year carcinoma cause-specific death rate in the IACC treated group was 16.7% compared with 57.1% in the conventional treatment group. The cumulative 5-year recurrence rate in the IACC treated group was 23.8% compared with 71.4% in the conventional treatment group.

Conclusions

The preliminary data suggest that IACC as an integral component of a multimodal treatment strategy is potentially effective in improving local disease control and overall disease-free survival in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 *See accompanying Article on page 54 and Brief Report on page 187.Supported in part by NIH center grant P30-EY014801; an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc, New York, New York, and a grant from the Plum Foundation, Los Angeles, California.This manuscript is based on a thesis that was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for membership in the American Ophthalmological Society.

PII: S0002-9394(05)00991-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.068

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 44-53.e1, January 2006