American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 141, Issue 5 , Pages 868-875, May 2006

Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Hysteresis Associated With Glaucoma Damage

  • Nathan G. Congdon, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Nathan G. Congdon, MD, Wilmer 120, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287
  • ,
  • Aimee T. Broman, MA

      Affiliations

    • Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Karen Bandeen-Roche, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Davinder Grover, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Harry A. Quigley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Accepted 8 December 2005. published online 18 January 2006.

Purpose

We sought to measure the impact of central corneal thickness (CCT), a possible risk factor for glaucoma damage, and corneal hysteresis, a proposed measure of corneal resistance to deformation, on various indicators of glaucoma damage.

Design

Observational study.

Methods

Adult patients of the Wilmer Glaucoma Service underwent measurement of hysteresis on the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and measurement of CCT by ultrasonic pachymetry. Two glaucoma specialists (H.A.Q., N.G.C.) reviewed the chart to determine highest known intraocular pressure (IOP), target IOP, diagnosis, years with glaucoma, cup-to-disk ratio (CDR), mean defect (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), glaucoma hemifield test (GHT), and presence or absence of visual field progression.

Results

Among 230 subjects, the mean age was 65 ± 14 years, 127 (55%) were female, 161 (70%) were white, and 194 (85%) had a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or suspected POAG. In multivariate generalized estimating equation models, lower corneal hysteresis value (P = .03), but not CCT, was associated with visual field progression. When axial length was included in the model, hysteresis was not a significant risk factor (P = .09). A thinner CCT (P = .02), but not hysteresis, was associated with a higher CDR at the most recent examination. Neither CCT nor hysteresis was associated with MD, PSD, or GHT “outside normal limits.”

Conclusions

Thinner CCT was associated with the state of glaucoma damage as indicated by CDR. Axial length and corneal hysteresis were associated with progressive field worsening.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(05)01292-4

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.007

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 141, Issue 5 , Pages 868-875, May 2006