American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 1 , Pages 10-16.e1, July 2006

Photodynamic Therapy With Verteporfin and Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

  • Erdem Ergun, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Sanatorium Hera, Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Erdem Ergun, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Sanatorium Hera, Loeblichgasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Noémi Maár, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Barbara Wimpissinger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Katharina Krepler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Andreas Wedrich, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
  • ,
  • Michael Stur, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Accepted 21 February 2006. published online 26 April 2006.

Purpose

To examine the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design

Retrospective, interventional case series.

Methods

Sixty eyes of 56 patients with neovascular AMD were treated with PDT with verteporfin followed by an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide. The main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), retreatment frequency with PDT (and triamcinolone), and frequency of side effects.

Results

Mean follow-up was 15.9 months (range 12 to 30 months, median 15 months). Twenty-three (38.3%) of 60 eyes had a stable result at 12 months’ follow-up (that is, loss/gain <three lines) and 34 (56.7%) of 60 had a loss of 3 lines or more. Three patients (5%) had an improvement of 3 lines or more. Lesion type, patient age, and lesion size had no influence on the outcome, but baseline VA had a statistically significant effect (P = .006). The median number of PDT–intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide treatments was one. One-third (20 of 60) of all eyes had an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) that required therapy. There were no cases of endophthalmitis, but 13 patients (21.6%) developed severe cataract that required surgery.

Conclusions

The combination of PDT and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide requires careful consideration as a treatment option for neovascular AMD. In our case series, this treatment combination did not prevent a considerable decrease in VA. The main benefit of this combination treatment was a low number of verteporfin treatments. Baseline VA was the main predictor of the final outcome.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by an unrestricted Scientific Financial Grant by Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland).

PII: S0002-9394(06)00343-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.048

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 1 , Pages 10-16.e1, July 2006