American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 4 , Pages 583-590, October 2006

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Glaucoma Patients and Healthy Subjects

  • Lorenz Barleon, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Esther M. Hoffmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Manfred Berres, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Biometrics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    • RheinAhrCampus Remagen, Department of Mathematics and Technology, Koblenz, Germany
  • ,
  • Norbert Pfeiffer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Franz H. Grus, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Franz H. Grus, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, 55101 Mainz, Germany

Accepted 6 May 2006. published online 16 June 2006.

Purpose

To investigate the agreement in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by dynamic contour tonometry PASCAL (DCT-PASCAL) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes with different central corneal thickness (CCT).

Design

Prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods

In a randomized order, three consecutive IOP measurements were performed on 197 eyes of 107 subjects by one examiner using both DCT-PASCAL and GAT on all eyes. Furthermore, ultrasonic pachymetry was performed. The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) was determined to compare IOP readings between DCT-PASCAL and GAT. Regression-based Bland and Altman analysis was used to evaluate agreement between the instruments.

Results

Mean IOP values obtained by both instruments were significantly correlated in healthy and glaucoma eyes (all healthy eyes [n = 66]: r = 0.8, P < .001, all glaucoma eyes [n = 131]: r = 0.96, P < .001). Neither GAT nor DCT-PASCAL showed a significant correlation with CCT (GAT: all eyes: r = 0.009, P = .9, DCT-PASCAL: all eyes: r = −0.05, P = .5). Bland and Altman analysis revealed the existence of proportional bias. Thus, 95% limits of agreement between the instruments varied with the actual IOP measurement.

Conclusions

DCT-PASCAL and GAT revealed a strong correlation in IOP measurements between glaucoma and healthy eyes. However, the analysis of agreement indicated some discrepancies between the instruments. Measurements with both GAT and DCT-PASCAL were not correlated with central corneal thickness.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Drs Grus and Hoffmann have received research support (instrument) from Swiss Microtechnology AG, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems Group Company, Switzerland.

PII: S0002-9394(06)00610-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.030

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 4 , Pages 583-590, October 2006