American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 4 , Pages 597.e1-597.e5, October 2006

Measurement of the Actual Dose of Triamcinolone Acetonide Delivered by Common Techniques of Intravitreal Injection

Presented in part at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, May 5, 2005, and at the American Society of Retina Specialists, Montreal, Canada, July 17, 2005.

Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.

Accepted 18 May 2006. published online 13 July 2006.

Purpose

To measure the actual dose of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) delivered during intravitreal injection performed by several common techniques.

Design

Experimental study.

Methods

A 0.1-ml, 40-mg vial of TA (Kenalog-40; Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Peapack, New Jersey, USA) was prepared according to one of four protocols and the mass determined after drying overnight on waxed paper. In group 1, a 0.1-ml aliquot of TA was dispensed with a 30-gauge needle after shaking the vial 10 or 30 times. Group 2 used a 27-gauge needle. In group 3, the supernatant was removed from the crystals. Group 4 passed the suspension through a 0.2-μm micropore filter and rinsed the crystals with saline.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between 30- or 27-gauge needles (P = 0.83, t test) or between shaking the vial 10 or 30 times before withdrawing the drug (P = 0.99). A statistically significant difference (t test, P = 0.001) was found between TA delivered from the initial 60% of each syringe (mean ± SD, 2.7 ± 1.0 mg) to that drawn from the last 40% of each syringe (7.8 ± 3.6 mg). Group 3 had a mean weight of 32.1 ± 7.0 mg and group 4, 10.6 ± 2.1 mg.

Conclusions

Efforts to achieve a 4.0-mg dose of TA, regardless of method used, are variable and inconsistent. Injecting through a small-gauge needle appears to concentrate the remaining suspension. Techniques to concentrate TA or remove aqueous preservatives by filtering effectively increase the concentration, but these results are variable.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 All fundings for this study came from internal sources.

PII: S0002-9394(06)00685-4

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.041

Refers to erratum:

  • Correction , 16 February 2007

    American Journal of Ophthalmology April 2007 (Vol. 143, Issue 4, Page 736)

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 4 , Pages 597.e1-597.e5, October 2006