Volume 142, Issue 5 , Pages 730-735.e1, November 2006
The In vitro Impact of Moxifloxacin and Gatifloxacin Concentration (0.5% vs 0.3%) and the Addition of Benzalkonium Chloride on Antibacterial Efficacy
Purpose
Varied concentrations of moxifloxacin (MOX) and gatifloxacin (GAT) and the addition of 0.005% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) were evaluated for eliminating Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS).
Design
In vitro laboratory investigation.
Methods
The time-kill survival of SA, PA, and CNS were tested at one, two, three, six, eight, and 24 hours to: (1) Mueller-Hinton broth, (2) BAK, (3) 0.5% MOX, (4) 0.5% GAT, (5) 0.3% MOX, (6) 0.3% GAT, (7) 0.3% GAT plus BAK, (8) 0.5% MOX plus BAK, (9) 8 μg/ml GAT, and (10) 8 μg/ml MOX. Antibiotic interactions (GAT and BAK) were determined by checkerboard testing. The outcome measures were (1) time-to-kill, (2) killing-rates, and (3) fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices.
Results
MOX and GAT at either 0.5% or 0.3% had equivalent antibacterial effects. BAK alone or the addition of BAK to either antibiotic eliminated SA and CNS within one hour, whereas 0.3% GAT plus BAK eliminated bacteria faster than 0.5% MOX (P = .016). For PA, BAK alone had no antibacterial effect. The kill rates of MOX and GAT were equivalent. FIC indices indicated that GAT and BAK were indifferent against SA and CNS, but antagonistic to PA.
Conclusion
As a preservative, MOX and GAT have equivalent antibacterial activity with similar killing rates. BAK appears to independently complement GAT for eliminating SA and CNS, but has no effect on PA. The in vitro predictive clinical effect due to varied antibiotic concentration and the addition of BAK requires confirmatory clinical studies for validation.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by the Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, has provided salary support. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York has provided financial support to the Department of Ophthalmology.The authors are paid consultant fees and have performed contract research for Allergan, Inc (Irvine, California) and Alcon Laboratories, Inc (Ft Worth, Texas).
PII: S0002-9394(06)00694-5
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.006
© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 142, Issue 5 , Pages 730-735.e1, November 2006
