American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 5 , Pages 736-744.e2, November 2006

Epithelial Dendritic Cell Distribution in Normal and Inflamed Human Cornea: In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study

  • Leonardo Mastropasqua, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Ophthalmic Clinic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
  • ,
  • Mario Nubile, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Ophthalmic Clinic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Mario Nubile, MD, Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Ophthalmic Clinic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Europa, 10 66100 Chieti, Italy
  • ,
  • Manuela Lanzini, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Ophthalmic Clinic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
  • ,
  • Paolo Carpineto, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Ophthalmic Clinic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
  • ,
  • Marco Ciancaglini, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine and Aging Science, Ophthalmic Clinic, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
  • ,
  • Tania Pannellini, MD

      Affiliations

    • Aging Research Center, University G. d’Annunzio Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • ,
  • Marta Di Nicola, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Bio-Statistics, University G. d’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
  • ,
  • Harminder S. Dua, MD, FRCS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Accepted 19 June 2006. published online 27 July 2006.

Purpose

To evaluate dendritic cell (DCs) density, distribution, and morphology in central corneal and limbal epithelium in normal subjects and patients with immune-mediated corneal inflammation using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

Design

Comparative case-controlled, observational confocal microscopy study.

Methods

A total of 135 eyes of 135 patients were investigated. Group 1 (normal eyes) included 45 eyes of 45 healthy volunteers, group 2 photorefractive keratectomy (PRK-treated eyes) included 45 myopic eyes of 45 patients treated with PRK, and group 3 (inflamed eyes) comprised 45 eyes of 45 patients affected by immune-mediated corneal inflammation. The central cornea and limbus were examined for epithelial dendritic-shaped cells using laser scanning IVCM. DCs density was calculated using image analysis software.

Results

Cells with a branching dendritic morphology were visualized in the basal epithelial layer, basal lamina, and subbasal nerve plexus, in the central cornea, and in the basal layer and basal membrane of the limbal epithelium. The limbal epithelium demonstrated DCs in 93.3%, 89%, and 97.7% of eyes in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = ns). Central epithelial DCs were observed in 20.0% and 13.3% of eyes in group 1 and 2 (P = ns), while in 93.3% of eyes in group 3 (P < .001). DCs were found to be significantly higher at the limbus compared with central cornea in each group (P < .001). Cell densities observed in group 3 were significantly greater than groups 1 and 2, at both locations (P < .05).

Conclusions

Laser scanning IVCM is a useful method for evaluating epithelial DCs distribution at the limbus and central cornea in both healthy and diseased eyes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(06)00782-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.057

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 142, Issue 5 , Pages 736-744.e2, November 2006