American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 143, Issue 4 , Pages 551-560.e1 , April 2007

The Outcome of Manuscripts Submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology Between 2002 and 2003

  • Thomas J. Liesegang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
    • Dr Liesegang is the Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and receives an honorarium.
    • Involved in design and conduct of study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript and
    • Thomas J. Liesegang, MD, is the Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Ophthalmology.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Thomas J. Liesegang, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
  • ,
  • Marwan Shaikh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
    • Involved in design and conduct of study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript and
    • Marwan Shaikh, BS, is presently a second-year medical student at the University of Toledo College of Medicine in Toledo, Ohio.
  • ,
  • Julia E. Crook

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistical Unit, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
    • involved in the statistical aspects of the study, and contributed to the data interpretation, review, and approval of the manuscript (J.E.C.).

,Accepted 5 December 2006.

  • Image Result

    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) and the time from withdrawal or rejection to publication in the subsequent jou

    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) and the time from withdrawal or rejection to publication in the subsequent journal. The AJO impact factor for 2004 of 2.33 is represented by a solid line. An estimated regression line is represented by a dashed line.

  • Image Result
    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) and region of origin of the AJO submitted manuscript. In this boxplot, the hor

    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) and region of origin of the AJO submitted manuscript. In this boxplot, the horizontal white line in the center of the box represents the sample median. The lower and upper parts of the box represent the sample first and third quartile, respectively. The lower and upper bars represent the sample minimum and maximum, respectively. *Note: Africa had only two manuscripts accepted in an alternate publication and thus two impact factors, which are represented by the Top and Bottom of the box. The AJO impact factor for 2004 of 2.33 is represented by the horizontal line.

  • Image Result
    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) by the article type (Full-Length Article or Brief Report) of the AJO submitted

    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) by the article type (Full-Length Article or Brief Report) of the AJO submitted manuscript. The overall AJO impact factor for 2004 of 2.33 is represented by the vertical line. Note that the impact factor for Full-Length Articles and Brief Reports in the AJO in 2004 was 3.2 and 1.2, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) and the immediacy index of the subsequent journal. The lines represent the AJO

    Impact factor of the subsequent journal after rejection by or withdrawal from the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO) and the immediacy index of the subsequent journal. The lines represent the AJO impact factor and immediacy index for 2004 of 2.33 and 0.286, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Graphic display of the outcome of all Full-Length Article and Brief Report manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between July 23, 2002 and December 31, 2003.

    Graphic display of the outcome of all Full-Length Article and Brief Report manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between July 23, 2002 and December 31, 2003.

 See accompanying Editorial on page 677.The authors indicate no financial support or financial conflict of interest.Statistical analyses were performed by Michael G. Heckman, MS, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

PII: S0002-9394(06)01412-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.004

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 143, Issue 4 , Pages 551-560.e1 , April 2007