American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 143, Issue 4 , Pages 596-600, April 2007

The Macular Automated Photostress Test

  • Mandeep Singh Dhalla

      Affiliations

    • Barnes Retina Institute, St Louis, Missouri
    • Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, St Louis, Missouri
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Mandeep Singh Dhalla, 1600 S. Brentwood Blvd., Suite 800, St Louis, MO 63144
  • ,
  • Aldo Fantin

      Affiliations

    • Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Detroit, Michigan
  • ,
  • Kevin J. Blinder

      Affiliations

    • Barnes Retina Institute, St Louis, Missouri
    • Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, St Louis, Missouri
  • ,
  • Jeffrey A. Bakal

      Affiliations

    • Queen’s University, Department of Ophthalmology, Kingston, Canada.

Accepted 20 December 2006. published online 29 January 2007.

Purpose

To introduce a standardized macular photostress test using an automated perimeter as a method to quantify macular disease severity and as a tool to distinguish optic neuropathy from macular pathology.

Design

Prospective interventional pilot study.

Methods

Twenty-five bilaterally pseudophakic subjects aged range, 65 to 84: 15 patients with varying severity of non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), five patients with no ocular disease, and five patients with moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Previously reported normative values served as controls for this study. Patients underwent foveal threshold testing using the Humphrey Visual Field Perimeter Model 750 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, California, USA). Baseline measurements were compared to threshold sensitivity after photostress at one minute and then two-minute intervals until sensitivity returned to baseline. Main outcome measures were baseline foveal threshold sensitivity, foveal threshold depression, and recovery following photostress.

Results

Automated macular photostress testing in macular disease (AMD) causes a decrease (P < .001) in baseline foveal sensitivity and a delay (P < .001) in recovery time to baseline sensitivity. Optic nerve pathology (POAG) does not affect (P = .343) the foveal response curve.

Conclusions

The macular automated photostress (MAP) test is an inexpensive, noninvasive, and readily accessible adjunct for evaluating patients with macular disease. This standardized protocol is useful in objectively defining disease severity, may be used to follow response to treatment, and could aid in distinguishing optic neuropathy from macular pathology.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(06)01459-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.033

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 143, Issue 4 , Pages 596-600, April 2007