American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 143, Issue 5 , Pages 828-834.e1 , May 2007

Complications of Primary Placement of Motility Post in Porous Polyethylene Implants During Enucleation

,Accepted 26 January 2007.

References 

  1. Custer PL, Kennedy RH, Woog JJ, et al. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2054–2061
  2. Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:274–280
  3. Guillinta P, Vasani SN, Granet DB, Kikkawa DO. Prosthetic motility in pegged vs unpegged integrated porous orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:119–122
  4. Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;8:75–81
  5. Rubin PA, Fay AM, Remulla HD. Primary placement of a motility coupling post in porous polyethylene orbital implants. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:826–832
  6. Tawfik HA, Dutton JJ. Primary peg placement in evisceration with the spherical porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1401–1406
  7. Liao SL, Chen MS, Lin LL. Primary placement of a titanium sleeve in hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Eye. 2005;19:400–405
  8. Liao SL, Shih MJ, Lin LL. Primary placement of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve in bioceramic orbital implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:235–241
  9. Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Wrapping hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:403–407
  10. Duong MH, Barraco P, Schapiro D, Ben Ayed H, Morax S. [Enucleation with on-the-table evisceration: is it a good technique?]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001;24:836–841
  11. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM, Fornoff J. Comparative motility of hydroxyapatite and alloplastic enucleation implants. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:513–516
  12. Buettner H, Bartley GB. Tissue breakdown and exposure associated with orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:669–673
  13. Shields CL, Shields JA, De Potter P, Singh AD. Problems with the hydroxyapatite orbital implant: experience with 250 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:702–706
  14. Ashworth JL, Rhatigan M, Brammar R, et al. A clinical study of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1997;7:1–8
  15. Dutton JJ. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:370–377
  16. Remulla HD, Rubin PA, Shore JW, et al. Complications of porous spherical orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:586–593
  17. Hsu WH, Green JR, Spilker MH, Rubin PAD. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:370–379
  18. Custer PL. Postoperative rotation of hydroxyapatite enucleation implants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1521–1523
  19. Holck DE, DeBacker CM, Dutton JJ. Deviated hydroxyapatite orbital implant syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:123–125
  20. Kaltreider SA, Newman SA. Prevention and management of complications associated with the hydroxyapatite implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;12:18–31
  21. Oestreicher JH, Liu E, Berkowitz M. Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:324–329
  22. Edelstein C, Shields CL, De Potter P, Shields JA. Complications of motility peg placement for the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1616–1621
  23. Ashworth J, Brammar R, Inkster C, Leatherbarrow B. A study of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant drilling procedure. Eye. 1998;12:37–42
  24. Lin CJ, Liao SL, Jou JR, et al. Complications of motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:394–396
  25. Lee SY, Jang JW, Lew H, et al. Complications in motility PEG placement for hydroxyapatite orbital implant in anophthalmic socket. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2002;46:103–107
  26. Jordan DR, Bawazeer A. Experience with 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite implants (FCI3). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:184–190
  27. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:128–135
  28. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Bawazeer A. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:69–74
  29. Jordan DR, Klapper SR. A new titanium peg system for hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:380–387
  30. Cheng MS, Liao SL, Lin LL. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:420–424
  31. Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Surgical techniques in enucleation: the role of various types of implants and the efficacy of pegged and nonpegged approaches. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2006;46:109–132
  32. Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, et al. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:364–371
  33. Inkster CF, Ng SGJ, Leatherbarrow B. Primary banked scleral patch graft in the prevention of exposure of hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:389–392

PII: S0002-9394(07)00120-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.01.049

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 143, Issue 5 , Pages 828-834.e1 , May 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution