American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 144, Issue 3 , Pages 347-357.e1, September 2007

Visual Performance of Patients with Bilateral vs Combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR Intraocular Lens Implants

  • Jay S. Pepose

      Affiliations

    • Pepose Vision Institute, St Louis, Missouri
    • Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Jay S. Pepose, Pepose Vision Institute, 16216 Baxter Road, Suite 205, Chesterfield, MO 63017
  • ,
  • Mujtaba A. Qazi

      Affiliations

    • Pepose Vision Institute, St Louis, Missouri
    • Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
  • ,
  • James Davies

      Affiliations

    • Innovision Eye Care Centers, Carlsbad, California
  • ,
  • John F. Doane

      Affiliations

    • Discover Vision Centers, Kansas City, Missouri
  • ,
  • James C. Loden

      Affiliations

    • Loden Eye Centers, Goodlettsville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Varunan Sivalingham

      Affiliations

    • E. Sivalingham MD Eye Center, Medford, New Jersey
  • ,
  • Ashraf M. Mahmoud

      Affiliations

    • Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Accepted 24 May 2007. published online 28 June 2007.

Purpose

To compare the visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens (IOLs) implants.

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized study.

Methods

Forty-nine patients were implanted with bilateral Crystalens (Eyeonics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA), ReSTOR (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), and ReZoom (American Medical Optics, Santa Clara, California, USA) or combined Crystalens and ReSTOR or Crystalens and ReZoom IOLs after phacoemulsification. Monocular and binocular testing four to six months after surgery included uncorrected and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near vision; mesopic contrast sensitivity function with and without glare; and quality-of-life and vision surveys six months after surgery.

Results

Monocular testing showed that eyes with Crystalens accommodating IOL had statistically better best-spectacle corrected distance, uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate, and best-corrected near vision. Eyes with the ReSTOR multifocal IOL had better uncorrected near vision, required the lowest reading add, and had the lowest uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate vision. Monocular mesopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare was better with the Crystalens IOL vs either multifocal IOL at specific spatial frequencies. The binocular subjective quality of vision and quality of life questionnaires were favorable for the bilateral Crystalens group.

Conclusions

Any combination of Crystalens in one or both eyes was better for intermediate vision. Any combination of ReSTOR in one or both eyes was better for near vision. The Crystalens and ReSTOR combination had better mean intermediate and near vision overall. A multifocal IOL in one or both eyes was associated with lower contrast sensitivity and more subjective reports of photic phenomena. The accommodating and multifocal IOL combinations elicited less night glare symptoms than in patients with either bilateral multifocal IOL, but more than with bilateral Crystalens implantation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(07)00519-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.036

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 144, Issue 3 , Pages 347-357.e1, September 2007