American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 1 , Pages 55-64.e1 , January 2008

Ten-year Follow-up of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for High Myopia

  • Jorge L. Alió

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernandez University, Medical School, Alicante, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Jorge L. Alió, Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante Avda, De Denia s/n, 03016, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Orkun Muftuoglu

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Research Fellow, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Dolores Ortiz

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernandez University, Medical School, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Juan Jose Pérez-Santonja

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernandez University, Medical School, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Alberto Artola

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernandez University, Medical School, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria Jose Ayala

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernandez University, Medical School, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria Jose Garcia

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante and Division of Ophthalmology, Miguel Hernandez University, Medical School, Alicante, Spain
  • ,
  • Gracia Castro de Luna

      Affiliations

    • Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Almeria, Almeria, Spain.

,Accepted 31 August 2007.

References 

  1. Shortt AJ, Bunce C, Allan BD. Evidence for superior efficacy and safety of LASIK over photorefractive keratectomy for correcion of myopia. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1897–1908
  2. Schallhorn SC, Amesbury EC, Tanzer DJ. Avoidance, recognition, and management of LASIK complications. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:733–739
  3. Ambrosio R, Wilson S. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003;18:2–10
  4. Melki SA, Azar DT. LASIK complications: etiology, management, and prevention. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;46:95–116
  5. Reinstein DZ, Waring GO. Have you seen the 10-year long-term safety data on LASIK?. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:843–845
  6. Hori-Komai Y, Toda I, Asano-Kato A, Tsubota K. Reasons for not performing refractive surgery. J Cataract Surg. 2002;28:795–797
  7. Comaish IF, Lawless MA. Progressive post-LASIK keratectasia: biomechanical instability or chronic disease process?. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:2206–2213
  8. Binder PS, Lindstrom RL, Stulting RM, et al. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:749–752
  9. Sekundo W, Bonicke K, Mattausch P, Wiegand W. Six-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and extrememyopia using a first-generation excimer laser and microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1152–1158
  10. O’Doherty M, O’Keeffe M, Kelleher C. Five-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:20–23
  11. Kymionis GD, Tsiklis NS, Astyrakakis N. Eleven-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:191–196
  12. Pallikaris IG, Siganos DS. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for correction of high myopia. J Refract Corneal Surg. 1994;10:498–510
  13. Pérez-Santonja JJ, Bellot J, Claramonte P, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:372–385
  14. Koch DD, Kohnen T, Obstbaum SA, Rosen ES. Format for reporting refractive surgical data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:285–287
  15. Waring GO. Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:459–466
  16. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia astigmatism: safety and efficacy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–187
  17. Knorz MC, Liermann A, Seiberth V, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia of −6.00 to −29.0 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:575–584
  18. Kawesch GM, Kezirian GM. Laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia with the VISX Star laser. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:653–661
  19. Maldonado BA, Onnis R. Results of laser in situ keratomileusis in different degrees of myopia. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:606–611
  20. Dada T, Sudan R, Sinha R. Results of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of −10 to−19 diopters with a Technolas 217 laser. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:44–47
  21. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1512–1522
  22. McGhee CN, Craig JP, Sachdev N, Weed KH, Brown AD. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:497–509
  23. Knorz MC, Wiesinger B, Liermann A, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:932–940
  24. Wang W, Li B, Wang Z, Li W. An empirical model of hyperopic shift with corticosteroid modulation and refractive power prediction after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 1995;11:S314–S318
  25. Carones F, Brancato R, Morico A, et al. Evaluation of three different approaches to perform excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996;27:S458–S465
  26. Pietila J, Makinen P, Pajari T, et al. Eight-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:110–115
  27. O’Connor J, O’Keeffe M, Condon PI. Twelve-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:871–877
  28. Rajan MS, Jaycock P, O’Brart D, et al. A long-term study of photorefractive keratectomy: 12-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1813–1824
  29. Chayet AS, Assil KK, Montes M, et al. Regression and its mechanism after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderate and high myopia. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1194–1199
  30. Lee KE, Klein BE, Klein R, Wong TY. Change in refraction over 10 years in adult population: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2566–2571
  31. Comaish IF, Lawless MA. Progressive post-LASIK keratectasia: biomechanical instability or chronic disease process?. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:2206–2213
  32. Rosa N, Furgiuele , Lanza M, et al. Correlation of changes in refraction and corneal topography after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:478–483
  33. Patel S, Alió JL, Pérez-Santonja JJ. A model to explain the difference between changes in refraction and cental ocular surface power after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:330–335
  34. Peter R, Hazeghi M, Job O, et al. Manual keratometry and videokeratography after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1748–1752
  35. Applegate RA, Howland HC. Magnification and visual acuity in refractive surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1335–1342
  36. Holladay JT. Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:63–66
  37. Randleman BJ, Russel B, Ward MA, et al. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:267–275
  38. Condon PI. Will keratectasia be a major complication for LASIK in the long-term?. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:2124–2132
  39. Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Archer TJ, et al. Probability model of the accuracy of residual stromal thickness prediction to reduce the risk of ectasia after LASIK. Part I: quantifying individual risk. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:851–860
  40. Holland DR, Maeda N, Hannush SB, et al. Unilateral keratoconus: incidence and quantitative topographic analysis. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1409–1413
  41. Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, Yang H. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:440–446
  42. Loewenstein A, Goldstein M, Lazar M. Retinal pathology occuring after excimer laser surgery or phakic intraocular lens implantation: evaluation of possible relationship. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:125–135
  43. Chang MA, Congdon NG, Bykhovskaya I, et al. The association between myopia and various subtypes of lens opacity: SEE (Salisbury Eye Evaluation) project. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1395–1401

 See accompanying Editorial on page 1.

PII: S0002-9394(07)00781-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.035

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 1 , Pages 55-64.e1 , January 2008