American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 4 , Pages 604-610.e1, April 2008

Perioperative Visual Loss After Nonocular Surgeries

  • Nancy J. Newman

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Nancy J. Newman, Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Emory Eye Center, 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322

Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Accepted 12 September 2007. published online 24 October 2007.

Purpose

To review the current knowledge of persistent visual loss after nonocular surgeries under general anesthesia.

Design

Perspective.

Methods

Literature review.

Results

The incidence of perioperative visual loss after nonocular surgeries ranges from 0.002% of all surgeries to as high as 0.2% of cardiac and spine surgeries. Any portion of the visual pathways may be involved, from the corneas to the occipital lobes, but the most common site of permanent injury is the optic nerves, and the most often presumed mechanism is ischemia. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) is more prevalent among cardiac surgery patients and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) predominates among those who have had spine and neck procedures. Patients range from age five to 81 years and typically awake with severe bilateral visual loss. Multiple factors have been proposed as risk factors for perioperative ION, including long duration in the prone position, excessive blood loss, hypotension, anemia, hypoxia, excessive fluid replacement, use of vasoconstricting agents, elevated venous pressure, head positioning, and a patient-specific vascular susceptibility that may be anatomic or physiologic. However, the risk factors for any given patient or procedure may vary and are likely multifactorial.

Conclusions

If, when an ophthalmologist is consulted for a patient with perioperative visual loss, an obvious ocular cause is not apparent, urgent neuroimaging should be obtained to rule out intracranial pathology. Anterior and posterior ION should be considered and careful documentation is essential. Currently, the pathogenesis of perioperative ION remains unclear, and preventive and therapeutic measures remain elusive.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(07)00807-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.016

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 4 , Pages 604-610.e1, April 2008