American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 4 , Pages 639-644.e1, April 2008

Causes of Primary Donor Failure in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

  • Lisanne Ham

      Affiliations

    • Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Jacqueline van der Wees

      Affiliations

    • Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Gerrit R.J. Melles

      Affiliations

    • Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Gerrit R. J. Melles, Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Accepted 5 December 2007. published online 15 January 2008.

Purpose

To determine the causes of primary failure of donor Descemet membrane transplants in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Design

Laboratory and clinical study.

Methods

From a larger series of eyes that underwent DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy, 11 transplanted corneas did not clear within the first week after surgery. During a secondary ‘Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty’ procedure, the first graft was carefully removed and analyzed with light microscopy. For each patient, the surgical video of the initial DMEK procedure was analyzed to determine the cause of transplant failure.

Results

With light microscopy, all but two explanted transplants had a endothelial cell density of 1700 cells/mm2 or higher. Three Descemet grafts may have been positioned upside down and three may have failed due to manipulation. One transplant could not be properly attached onto the recipient posterior stroma because of insufficient air-support in a post-vitrectomy eye. For four eyes, no obvious cause of failure could be determined.

Conclusion

Unexpectedly, graft failure after DMEK may not primarily result from tissue damage during implantation and associated endothelial cell loss. Detached grafts may therefore be managed by early reposition. When the graft is attached after surgery but fails to clear, secondary surgical intervention may be postponed, because these corneas may clear spontaneously after several weeks.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(07)01014-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.006

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 4 , Pages 639-644.e1, April 2008