American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 5 , Pages 775-779.e1, May 2008

One-Year Results of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation (KeraRing) using Femtosecond Laser in Patients with Keratoconus

  • Efekan Coskunseven

      Affiliations

    • Dunya Eye Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • George D. Kymionis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • ,
  • Nikolaos S. Tsiklis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Nikolaos S. Tsiklis, Institute of Vision and Optics, University of Crete Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • Serife Atun

      Affiliations

    • Dunya Eye Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ebru Arslan

      Affiliations

    • Dunya Eye Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mirko R. Jankov

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • ,
  • Ioannis G. Pallikaris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Accepted 14 December 2007. published online 30 January 2008.

Purpose

To report the results of intrastromal corneal ring segment [ICRS] (KeraRing; Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) implantation using a femtosecond laser (IntraLase Corp, Irvine, California, USA) in keratoconic patients.

Design

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional study.

Methods

Thirty-two keratoconic patients (50 eyes) who underwent ICRS insertion using a femtosecond laser for channel creation and completed at least one year of follow-up were included in this study. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, topographic findings, and adverse events were assessed.

Results

No intraoperative complications were demonstrated in this series of patients. At the first postoperative day, segment migration to the incision site was seen in three eyes (6%; early postoperative complication). To avoid melting, we repositioned the migrated segment away from the incision site. Serious second migration was not seen and we did not need to reposition any segment again. At the last postoperative examination, there was a statistically significant reduction in the spherical equivalent refractive error compared with that observed at the examination before implantation (mean ± standard deviation, −5.62 ± 4.15 diopters [D; range, −23.62 to 0.50 D] to −2.49 ± 2.68 D [range, −11.12 to 3.5 D]; P < .001). The UCVA before implantation was 20/40 or worse in 47 eyes (94%; range, counting fingers to 20/30), whereas at the last follow-up examination, 14 (28%) of 50 eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better (range, counting fingers to 20/25). Nine eyes (18%) maintained the preimplantation BSCVA, whereas 39 eyes (68%) experienced a BSCVA gain of one to four lines at the last follow-up examination. Only in two eyes (4%; two patients) with advanced keratoconus (stage III) was there a decrease of up to two lines. Despite this deterioration in BSCVA, the patients did not want to remove the ICRSs, because there was an increase of UCVA. No late postoperative complications were observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

ICRS (KeraRing) implantation using femtosecond laser for tunnel creation is a minimally invasive procedure for improving visual acuity (both UCVA and BSCVA) in keratoconic patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(07)01075-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.022

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 145, Issue 5 , Pages 775-779.e1, May 2008