American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 146, Issue 1 , Pages 15-22.e2, July 2008

Macular Morphology after Cataract Surgery with Primary Posterior Capsulorhexis and Posterior Optic Buttonholing

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Accepted 25 February 2008. published online 31 March 2008.

Purpose

To evaluate possible changes in macular morphology after cataract surgery with combined primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing in comparison to conventional in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Design

Prospective randomized study.

Methods

Fifty consecutive age-related cataract patients with normal macular morphology and function waiting for bilateral cataract surgery were enrolled. Cataract surgery with combined primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing was performed in one eye; in the fellow eye cataract surgery was performed with in-the-bag IOL implantation, leaving the posterior lens capsule untouched. Optical coherence tomography measurements were performed one week and one month postoperatively.

Results

During follow-up, no statistically significant changes of macular morphology could be observed in any of the tested patients. Mean central retinal thickness, minimum and maximum retinal thickness, and central retinal volume were all statistically comparable between the eyes with combined primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing and the control eyes (P > .05). Best-corrected visual acuity was full in all patients (Snellen 20/25 and better). No cases of subclinical macular edema were observed.

Conclusion

Cataract surgery with combined primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing apparently does not increase the risk for postoperative macular edema in patients with a normal macula, since no cases of biomicroscopically noticeable macular edema with visual loss were observed in the first 1,000 eyes with primary posterior capsulorhexis/posterior optic buttonholing cataract surgery and no case of subclinical macular edema was found in this prospective randomized study.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(08)00158-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.02.022

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 146, Issue 1 , Pages 15-22.e2, July 2008