A Systematic Literature Review of Surgical Interventions for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency in Humans
Accepted 13 March 2008. published online 25 April 2008.
Refers to article:
Surgical Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: Are We Really Transplanting Stem Cells?
, 15 May 2008
Shigeto Shimmura, Kazuo Tsubota
American Journal of Ophthalmology
August 2008 (Vol. 146, Issue 2, Pages 154-155) Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (43 KB)
Purpose
To evaluate the relative benefits and to identify any adverse effects of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).
Design
Systematic literature review.
Methods
We searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 1989 through September 30, 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science citation index, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify any additional reports. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. The main outcome measure was improvement in vision of at least two Snellen lines of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data on adverse outcomes also were collected.
Results
Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized controlled studies. All 26 studies were either prospective or retrospective case series. For bilateral severe LSCD, keratolimbal allograft was the most common intervention with systemic immunosuppression. Other interventions included eccentric penetrating keratolimbal allografts and cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial grafts. An improvement in BCVA of two lines or more was reported in 31% to 67% of eyes. For unilateral severe LSCD, the most common surgical intervention was contralateral conjunctival limbal autograft, with 35% to 88% of eyes gaining an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more. The only study evaluating partial LSCD showed an improvement in BCVA of two lines or more in 39% of eyes.
Conclusions
Studies to date have not provided strong evidence to guide clinical practice on which surgery is most beneficial to treat various types of LSCD. Standardized data collection in a multicenter LSCD register is suggested.
aDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
bHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
cThe Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, The Gartnavel General Hospital and The Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Inquiries to Paul A. Cauchi, Department of Ophthalmology, Floor 3 Management Building, The Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT