American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 146, Issue 4 , Pages 567-572.e1, October 2008

Effects of Aging on Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Their Impact on 24-hour Measurement of Intraocular Pressure

Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Accepted 20 May 2008. published online 09 July 2008.

Purpose

To study the effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP).

Design

Experimental study.

Methods

Fifteen older volunteers with healthy eyes (age range, 50 to 80 years) were housed for one day in a sleep laboratory with a 16-hour diurnal or wake period and an eight-hour nocturnal or sleep period. Every two hours, sitting corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and IOP were measured. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter. Data were compared with previous observations in 15 healthy younger volunteers (age range, 20 to 25 years).

Results

Variations in 24-hour corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were not significant in the older subjects, but there were time-dependent variations in CCT and IOP. The nocturnal CCT was thicker than the diurnal CCT, but the IOP difference between the diurnal and nocturnal periods was not significant. Cosine-fits of CCT and IOP showed synchronized 24-hour rhythms. The phase timing of CCT rhythm appeared significantly earlier than the phase timing of IOP rhythm. Compared with younger subjects, older subjects had a lower mean 24-hour corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, but not a lower CCT. Phase timings of 24-hour rhythms of CCT and IOP were significantly delayed by aging.

Conclusions

Aging may lower corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, but neither parameter shows a significant 24-hour variation. Aging may not change CCT significantly, but can shift its 24-hour rhythm. The 24-hour IOP pattern in this group of older subjects is not an artifact resulting from a variation in corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, or CCT.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(08)00412-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.026

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 146, Issue 4 , Pages 567-572.e1, October 2008