American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 146, Issue 5 , Pages 641-648.e1, November 2008

Maximizing Satisfaction with Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: The Missing Links

  • Jay S. Pepose

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Jay S. Pepose, Pepose Vision Institute, 1815 Clarkson Road, Chesterfield, MO 63017

Pepose Vision Institute; and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri

Accepted 21 July 2008. published online 15 September 2008.

Purpose

To critically analyze recent studies of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to examine opportunities to enhance patient satisfaction further.

Design

Perspective.

Methods

Literature review and commentary.

Results

Although overall patient satisfaction with the currently available presbyopia-correcting IOLs remains high, it is not uniform. Current accommodating or multifocal IOL designs are hampered by limited accommodative ability or reduced contrast sensitivity and photic phenomenon, respectively. Toric IOLs and IOLs inserted through smaller incisions minimize postoperative wound healing changes. Better assessment of total ocular characteristics, including corneal wavefront and pupil size and dynamics, will allow further IOL customization to each patient.

Conclusions

Postoperative modification of IOLs may offset variations in postoperative healing that cannot be predicted before surgery. Further methods to assess and modify neural adaptive capability are needed. Newer IOL designs may enhance functional depth of field further without compromising contrast sensitivity or inducing photic phenomena.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(08)00585-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.033

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 146, Issue 5 , Pages 641-648.e1, November 2008