American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 147, Issue 2 , Pages 260-266, February 2009

Inter-device Variability of the Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography

  • Yaniv Barkana

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Yaniv Barkana, Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel
  • ,
  • Zvia Burgansky-Eliash

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
  • ,
  • Yariv Gerber

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Shlomo Melamed

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • ,
  • Meira Neudorfer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Isaac Avni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
  • ,
  • Elisha Bartov

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
  • ,
  • Yair Morad

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel

Accepted 11 August 2008. published online 06 October 2008.

Purpose

To assess inter-device measurement variability with the Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Design

Evaluation of diagnostic test technology.

Methods

Eight eyes of eight healthy subjects were examined with four different Stratus machines in four medical centers during a period of five hours using fast retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and fast macula protocols. Inter-device measurement variability and signal strength was assessed with standard deviation, coefficient of variance, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated between signal strength and thickness measurements.

Results

Statistically significant differences were not found for all macular parameters and all but one RNFL parameter. Mean signal strengths obtained with the four Stratus machines were significantly different; the newer the machine, the stronger signal strength it produced. Some RNFL parameters were moderately and statistically significantly correlated with signal strength.

Conclusions

We did not observe statistically significant differences in any macular and all but one RNFL parameter between the four Stratus OCT machines. Signal strength was significantly different between the machines, and significantly correlated with some RNFL parameters. Inter-machine variability in RNFL measurements may have clinical significance. Signal strength should be included in the assessment of measurements obtained on different machines and in serial examinations with a single Stratus machine during patient follow-up.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(08)00651-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.008

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 147, Issue 2 , Pages 260-266, February 2009