American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 147, Issue 4 , Pages 583-586.e1, April 2009

Glitazone Use Associated with Diabetic Macular Edema

  • Donald S. Fong

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California and Clinical Trials Research, Pasadena, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Donald S. Fong, Clinical Trials Research, SCPMG, 100 S. Los Robles, Pasadena, CA 91101
  • ,
  • Richard Contreras

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, California

Accepted 13 October 2008. published online 02 February 2009.

Purpose

To determine the ocular safety of glitazones in patients with diabetes, we investigated the association of diabetic macular edema (DME) in a large population of glitazone users.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Methods

The study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. About 170,000 persons with diabetes were identified using the Diabetes Case Identification Database. Glitazone drug use was obtained from the pharmacy database. The main outcome measure was the development of macular edema (ME). The χ2 test was used to compare proportions and t tests were used for means. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding variables.

Results

In 2006, there were 996 new cases of ME. Glitazone users were more likely to develop ME in 2006 (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 3.0). After excluding patients who did not have the drug benefit, did not have an eye exam, and had a HgA1c <7.0, glitazone use was still associated with an increased risk of developing ME (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.8).

Conclusion

The current study appears to show that the glitazone class of drug is associated with DME. After adjusting for confounding factors of age, glycemic control, and insulin use, glitazones are still modestly associated with DME. A more in-depth study will need to be done to evaluate the role of other confounding factors. When treating patients with DME, ophthalmologists should consider the role of the glitazones.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(08)00812-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.016

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 147, Issue 4 , Pages 583-586.e1, April 2009