American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 214-220.e1, August 2009

Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Hyperopic Pseudophakic Patients Implanted with the Acri.LISA 366D Multifocal Intraocular Lens

  • Luis Fernández-Vega

      Affiliations

    • Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
    • Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
  • ,
  • José F. Alfonso

      Affiliations

    • Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
    • Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to José F. Alfonso, Instituto Oftalmológico Fernández-Vega, Avda. Dres. Fernández-Vega 34, 33012 Oviedo, Spain
  • ,
  • Begoña Baamonde

      Affiliations

    • Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
    • Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
  • ,
  • David Madrid-Costa

      Affiliations

    • Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
    • Department of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Robert Montés-Micó

      Affiliations

    • Department of Optics, Faculty of Physics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Javier Lozano

      Affiliations

    • Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

Accepted 21 February 2009. published online 11 May 2009.

Purpose

To assess the visual quality after bilateral implantation of the Acri.LISA 366D intraocular lens (IOL; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) in patients with hyperopia.

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized study.

Methods

One hundred and seventy eyes of 85 patients had bilateral implantation of the Acri.LISA 366D IOL. The patients were divided into 2 groups: low to moderate hyperopia (IOL power, 21 to 24.5 diopters [D]) and high hyperopia (IOL power, 25 to 36 D). Monocular and binocular best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), best distance-corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), binocular best distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (VA), and distance contrast sensitivity (CSF) under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (5 cd/m2) conditions were determined.

Results

At the 6-month postoperative visit, there were no statistically significant differences in monocular and binocular BSCVA (P = .06 and P = .09, respectively). Monocular and binocular BCNVA were comparable between both groups (P = .24 and P = .42, respectively). The mean binocular best distance-corrected intermediate VA changed significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P < .01) in both groups, and there were no statistically significant differences between groups at any distance. Differences were not found between groups in binocular CSF under mesopic and photopic conditions.

Conclusions

Bilateral implantation of the Acri.LISA 366D in patients with high hyperopia provided a satisfactory full-range of vision comparable with that obtained in patients with low to moderate hyperopia.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00167-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.036

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 214-220.e1, August 2009