« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 148, Issue 4
, Pages 528-535.e1
, October 2009
Comparison of Corneal Powers Obtained from 4 Different Devices
References
- . Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18:342–347
- . Comparison of three keratometry instruments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:407–408
- . Comparison of the accuracy of computerized videokeratography and keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:178–181
- . Comparison of portable automated keratometry and manual keratometry for IOL calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:1213–1216
- . Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1961–1968
- . Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:48–53
- . A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:458–462
- . Reliability of the IOLMaster in measuring corneal power changes after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:409–413
- . Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:85–88
- . An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children. Cornea. 2006;25:383–387
- . Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon Nvision-K5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:320–324
- . First steps with the Zeiss IOLMaster: a comparison between acoustic contact biometry and non-contact optical biometry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220:309–314
- . Effect of pupil dilation on the accuracy of the IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1993–1996
- . The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2325–2333
- . Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:103–113
- . Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:61–79
- . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
- . Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:368–376
- . Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18:125–129
- . Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1742–1747
- . The performance of four different corneal topographers on normal human corneas and its impact on orthokeratology lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:175–183
- Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:127–133
- . Biometry of 7,500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90:360–368
- . Cataract patients in a defined Swedish population 1986–1990. II (Preoperative observations). Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994;72:10–15
- . Incidence of astigmatism in a cataract practice. J Refract Surg. 1988;4:173–178
PII: S0002-9394(09)00321-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.028
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 148, Issue 4
, Pages 528-535.e1
, October 2009
