American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 148, Issue 6 , Pages 823-829.e1, December 2009

Molecular Prognostic Testing and Individualized Patient Care in Uveal Melanoma

  • J. William Harbour

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to J. William Harbour, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8096, St Louis, MO 63110

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri

Accepted 5 July 2009. published online 05 October 2009.

Purpose

To critically assess the status of molecular prognostic testing and its use for individualized patient care in uveal melanoma.

Design

Perspective, literature review, evidence assessment, and commentary.

Methods

Evaluation of selected articles from the literature and the authors' clinical and laboratory studies.

Results

The most accurate molecular tests for predicting metastatic death in patients with uveal melanoma currently involve automated techniques for assessing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) copy number alterations and gene expression profiling. Most tests reported in the literature to date do not provide adequate scientific and statistical validation to be used outside of an ethically supervised investigational environment.

Conclusions

Many cytogenetic and molecular prognostic tests for uveal melanoma have been reported, yet few have reached the standards required for routine clinical testing. Clinicians must understand the statistical and scientific limitations of the tests they are using, and appropriate ethical oversight is essential until such time that validated testing instruments are available that are performed in a standardized clinical testing environment. Well-controlled prospective studies are necessary to identify the most accurate, widely accessible, and affordable tests for routine clinical use.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00500-5

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.004

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 148, Issue 6 , Pages 823-829.e1, December 2009