American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 95-101, January 2010

Sequential Glaucoma Implants in Refractory Glaucoma

  • Aashish Anand

      Affiliations

    • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
  • ,
  • Celso Tello

      Affiliations

    • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
    • New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
  • ,
  • Paul A. Sidoti

      Affiliations

    • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
    • New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
  • ,
  • Robert Ritch

      Affiliations

    • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
    • New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
  • ,
  • Jeffrey M. Liebmann

      Affiliations

    • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
    • New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Jeffrey M. Liebmann, 310 East 14th Street, New York, New York 10003;

Accepted 16 July 2009. published online 19 October 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of a second glaucoma implant in eyes with prior glaucoma implant surgery and inadequate intraocular pressure (IOP) control.

Design

Retrospective observational cohort study.

Methods

Patients undergoing a second glaucoma implant surgery from 1996 to 2008 were included. Outcome measures included visual acuity, IOP, glaucoma medication use, and complications. Success was defined as IOP < 21 mm Hg (criterion 1) and IOP < 17 mm Hg (criterion 2), with at least 25% reduction in IOP and no prolonged hypotony.

Results

Forty-three eyes (43 patients) had a mean follow-up of 32.6 ± 21.6 months. Life-table analysis demonstrated success rates of 93%, 89%, and 83% using criterion 1 and 83%, 75%, and 75% using criterion 2 at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. At last follow-up, mean IOP (13.6 ± 4.6 vs 24.7 ± 7.5 mm Hg; P < .001) and mean number of medications (1.4 ± 1.2 vs 3.9 ± 1.2; P < .001) were lower following the second implant. There was no difference in preoperative and most recent logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuities (0.86 ± 0.13 vs 1.1 ± 0.13; P = .07). The most frequently used second implants were similar in percentage IOP reduction (Baerveldt implant, 45 ± 19%; Ahmed valve, 40 ± 18%; P = .4).

Conclusions

A second glaucoma implant may effectively lower IOP in eyes with refractory glaucoma.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00517-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.019

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 95-101, January 2010