American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 120-126, January 2010

Long-term Outcome of Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery

  • Marie Passemard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Younes Yakoubi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Aurore Muselier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Isabelle Hubert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Alexandre Guillaubey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Alain M. Bron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Jean Paul Berrod

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Catherine Creuzot-Garcher

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Service d'Ophtalmologie, CHU Dijon, Rue du Faubourg Raines, 21000 Dijon, France

Accepted 5 August 2009. published online 20 October 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the role of preoperative macular hole (MH) diameter, cataract surgery, and cystoid macular edema (CME) in the reopening of idiopathic macular hole (IMH) after initially successful surgery.

Design

Multicenter, retrospective, comparative case series.

Methods

One hundred and thirty patients (135 eyes) with stage 2, 3, or 4 IMH were included after successful IMH repair at Dijon University Hospital or Nancy University Hospital. The eyes were separated into 4 groups according to the lens status: group 1, vitrectomy in pseudophakic eyes; group 2, vitrectomy and cataract extraction as a combined procedure; group 3, vitrectomy followed by cataract extraction; group 4, vitrectomy on eyes that remained phakic. All patients underwent a complete vitrectomy with retinal inner limiting membrane peeling and intraocular gas tamponade. The main outcome measures were IMH closure rate and best-corrected visual acuity.

Results

Mean duration of symptoms was 8.6 ± 7.6 months. The follow-up was 37 ± 8.6 months (range, 30 to 67 months). The mean preoperative IMH diameter was 454 ± 191 μm. No MH reopened during the follow-up after the initial vitreous surgery. Seven cases of CME were observed (1 in groups 1 and 2; 5 in group 3), and cataract surgery was performed in the 53 patients in group 3 with a mean delay of 11.6 months.

Conclusions

Cataract extraction, CME, or preoperative MH diameter measured by optical coherence tomography were not identified as risk factors for IMH reopening.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00551-0

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.003

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 120-126, January 2010