American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 54-61.e2, January 2010

Clinical Benefits of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis

  • William B. Stason

      Affiliations

    • Schneider Institutes for Health Policy Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to William B. Stason, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School, MS 035, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454
  • ,
  • Moaven Razavi

      Affiliations

    • Schneider Institutes for Health Policy Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Deborah S. Jacobs

      Affiliations

    • Boston Foundation for Sight, Needham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Donald S. Shepard

      Affiliations

    • Schneider Institutes for Health Policy Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Jose A. Suaya

      Affiliations

    • Schneider Institutes for Health Policy Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Lynnette Johns

      Affiliations

    • Boston Foundation for Sight, Needham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Perry Rosenthal

      Affiliations

    • Boston Foundation for Sight, Needham, Massachusetts

Accepted 22 July 2009. published online 29 October 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis (Boston Foundation for Sight, Needham, Massachusetts, USA) on visual acuity (VA) and visual functioning in patients with severe corneal ectasia, irregular astigmatism, or ocular surface disease.

Design

Prospective, interventional case series.

Methods

The study examined the effects of this prosthesis on VA and visual functioning in consecutive patients with corneal ectasia, irregular astigmatism, or ocular surface disease who had failed conventional therapies and were seen at the Boston Foundation for Sight between January 1 and June 30, 2006. Outcomes were best-corrected VA using Snellen charts and visual functioning using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) at 6 months. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records.

Results

Of the 101 patients, 80 were fitted with a prosthesis in one or both eyes, and follow-up Visual Functioning Questionnaire data were obtained in 69 eyes. Best-corrected VA improved by a change in mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) units of −0.39 (converted from Snellen) with a change of −0.54 logMAR units in patients with ectasia or astigmatism and −0.22 logMAR units in patients with ocular surface disease. Mean composite visual functioning scores increased from 57.0 to 77.8 (P < .0001). Improvements in composite Visual Functioning Questionnaire scores were similar in patients with ectasia or ocular surface disease; but vision-related subscores improved more in patients with ectasia, whereas subscores for ocular pain, role difficulties, and dependency improved more in patients with ocular surface disease.

Conclusions

The Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis significantly improved VA and visual functioning in patients with corneal ectasia, irregular astigmatism, and ocular surface disease who had failed conventional therapies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00555-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.037

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 54-61.e2, January 2010