American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 70-76.e2, January 2010

Management of Iris Melanomas With 125Iodine Plaque Radiotherapy

  • Bruno F. Fernandes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ocular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Bruno F. Fernandes, 600 University Street, Room 18-706, Toronto, ON M5G-2M9, Canada
  • ,
  • Hatem Krema

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ocular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Emiliano Fulda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ocular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Charles J. Pavlin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ocular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • David G. Payne

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Hugh D. McGowan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ocular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Ernest Rand Simpson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ocular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Accepted 6 August 2009. published online 04 November 2009.

Purpose

To report the experience of the Princess Margaret Hospital/University Health Network with the treatment of iris melanoma (IM) with 125Iodine plaque brachytherapy.

Design

Retrospective noncomparative case series.

Methods

All cases of IM submitted to 125Iodine plaque radiotherapy were included. Patients' demographic, clinical, management, and follow-up data were reviewed. Outcome measures included rates of tumor control, eye preservation, systemic metastases, and brachytherapy-related complications.

Results

Fourteen IMs were included in the study. All patients had blue/green irises. Mean largest basal dimension and thickness were 7.1 ± 2.1 mm (range, 4.0 to 11.5 mm) and 2.2 ± 0.8 mm (range, 1.0 to 3.5 mm), respectively. Ten patients (71%) had seeding and 2 (14%) had glaucoma at presentation. Median follow-up was 26.6 ± 19.5 months (range, 6 to 72 months). Tumor control was achieved in 100% of the cases and no eye was enucleated because of radiation-induced complications. At last visit, all patients were alive and free of metastasis. Final visual acuity was the same as or better than before treatment in 9 patients (75%). Cataract was the most common complication (8; 75%), followed by persistent glaucoma (2; 17%) and anterior uveitis (1; 8%). No other significant complication was seen during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Plaque radiotherapy is a safe and effective conservative treatment option for IM, although cataract is a common, yet treatable, complication. This treatment scheme circumvents an intraocular procedure and may avoid the dissemination of malignant cells, and provides a margin of safety in the treatment of clinically undetectable disease.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00569-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.007

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 1 , Pages 70-76.e2, January 2010