Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 229-237.e2, 1 February 2010
Predictive Factor Analysis for Successful Performance of Iris Recognition-Assisted Dynamic Rotational Eye Tracking during Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Purpose
To analyze the predictive factors associated with success of iris recognition and dynamic rotational eye tracking on a laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) platform with active assessment and correction of intraoperative cyclotorsion.
Design
Interventional case series.
Methods
Two hundred seventy-five eyes of 142 consecutive candidates underwent LASIK with attempted iris recognition and dynamic rotational tracking on the Technolas 217z100 platform (Techolas Perfect Vision, St Louis, Missouri, USA) at a tertiary care ophthalmic hospital. The main outcome measures were age, gender, flap creation method (femtosecond, microkeratome, epi-LASIK), success of static rotational tracking, ablation algorithm, pulses, and depth; preablation and intraablation rotational activity were analyzed and evaluated using regression models.
Results
Preablation static iris recognition was successful in 247 eyes, without difference in flap creation methods (P = .6). Age (partial correlation, −0.16; P = .014), amount of pulses (partial correlation, 0.39; P = 1.6 × 10−8), and gender (P = .02) were significant predictive factors for the amount of intraoperative cyclodeviation. Tracking difficulties leading to linking the ablation with a new intraoperatively acquired iris image were more with femtosecond-assisted flaps (P = 2.8 × 10−7) and the amount of intraoperative cyclotorsion (P = .02). However, the number of cases having nonresolvable failure of intraoperative rotational tracking was similar in the 3 flap creation methods (P = .22).
Conclusions
Intraoperative cyclotorsional activity depends on the age, gender, and duration of ablation (pulses delivered). Femtosecond flaps do not seem to have a disadvantage over microkeratome flaps as far as iris recognition and success of intraoperative dynamic rotational tracking is concerned.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0002-9394(09)00621-7
doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.021
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 229-237.e2, 1 February 2010
