American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 302-306, 1 February 2010

Idiopathic Epiretinal Macular Membrane and Cataract Extraction: Combined versus Consecutive Surgery

  • Brice Dugas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Rym Ouled-Moussa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Pierre-Olivier Lafontaine

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Alexandre Guillaubey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Paul Berrod

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Isabelle Hubert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Alain M. Bron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • Catherine P. Creuzot-Garcher

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital, Dijon, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Catherine P. Creuzot-Garcher, Service d'Ophtalmologie, CHU Dijon, Rue du Faubourg Raines, 21000 Dijon, France

Accepted 16 September 2009.

Purpose

To assess the functional and anatomic outcomes of cataract and idiopathic epiretinal macular membrane extraction in combined and consecutive surgeries.

Design

Multicenter, retrospective, comparative case series.

Methods

One hundred seventy-four patients (174 eyes) with an epiretinal macular membrane (ERM) and cataract were operated on in 1 or 2 sessions in 2 academic centers, Dijon University Hospital and Nancy University Hospital. Combined surgery (n = 109) and consecutive surgery (n = 65) were performed between 2005 and 2006. All patients underwent ERM and internal limiting membrane removal. Cataract extraction was performed with phacoemulsification followed by a posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. The main outcome measures were near and far visual acuity and central macular thickness evaluated with optical coherence tomography.

Results

After a 12-month follow-up, the postoperative best-corrected visual acuities significantly improved in both the combined and the consecutive surgery groups (near and far vision in both groups, P < .0001). Similarly, the postoperative macular thickness significantly decreased in both groups (P < .0001). We noted no statistical differences between the visual acuity improvement in both groups (near vision, P= .54; far vision, P = .38). However, visual acuity recovery was quicker in the combined surgery group.

Conclusions

Combined and consecutive surgeries are effective procedures to treat idiopathic ERM. The functional and anatomic results are equivalent in both procedures.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00724-7

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.011

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 302-306, 1 February 2010