American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 4 , Pages 594-601, April 2010

Demonstration of Efficacy in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease with 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution (Vismed, Rejena)

  • Roger Vogel

      Affiliations

    • Rx Development Resources, LLC, Tampa, Florida
  • ,
  • R. Stephens Crockett

      Affiliations

    • Design and Analysis of Trials Associates, Inc, Grand Bay, Alabama
  • ,
  • Neal Oden

      Affiliations

    • The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Maryland
  • ,
  • Terry W. Laliberte

      Affiliations

    • Lantibio, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Luis Molina

      Affiliations

    • Lantibio, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Luis Molina, PhD, Lantibio, Inc, 100 Europe Dr, Suite 421, Chapel Hill, NC 27517
  • ,
  • Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Solution Study Group

Accepted 30 September 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.18% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (Rejena, Vismed) compared with its vehicle for the treatment of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Design

Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Methods

A total of 444 subjects with dry eye disease were randomized 1:1 to active study drug (n = 221) or vehicle control (n = 223) in this multicenter, double-masked trial. Subjects instilled 1 to 2 drops, 3 to 6 times daily for 14 days, with evaluations at Days 7 and 14. The study's 2 primary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline at Day 7 in lissamine green staining scores (objective) and in global symptom frequency scores (subjective). Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student t test in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Results

At Day 7, the differences between the active and vehicle groups in change from baseline for lissamine green staining score (P = .050, Wilcoxon; P = .029, t test) and global symptom frequency score (P = .050, Wilcoxon; P = .017, t test) were both statistically significant. There were no clinically relevant safety findings related to the use of Rejena.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the clinical efficacy of Rejena in the treatment of dry eye disease in both a primary objective endpoint and a primary subjective endpoint when compared to its vehicle. The study results also supported the well-known safety profile of Rejena.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(09)00736-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.023

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 4 , Pages 594-601, April 2010