Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 149, Issue 5, Pages 839-851.e1 (May 2010)


View previous. 24 of 38 View next.

Topical Mecamylamine for Diabetic Macular Edema

Peter A. CampochiaroaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Syed Mahmood Shaha, Gulnar Hafiza, Jeffery S. Heierb, Eugene S. Litc, Ingrid Zimmer-Gallera, Roomasa Channaa, Quan Dong Nguyena, Beena Syeda, Diana V. Doa, Lili Lua, James Monkd, John P. Cookee, M. Ken Kengatharand, Henry H. Hsud

Accepted 1 December 2009. published online 26 February 2010.

Purpose

Stimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors on vascular endothelial cells promotes angiogenesis and vascular permeability in animal models. The safety and bioactivity of topical mecamylamine, an antagonist of nACh receptors, was tested in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Design

A multicenter phase I/II clinical trial.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with chronic diabetic macular edema received 1% mecamylamine topically twice daily for 12 weeks, the primary end point. Patients underwent safety assessments, measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and measurement of foveal thickness using optical coherence tomography at baseline, 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks.

Results

Mecamylamine drops were well tolerated and there were no drug-related safety problems. Mean improvement in BCVA at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks was 2.8, 1.9, 2.4, 0.8, and 3.1 letters, respectively. There was little change in mean excess foveal thickness. There was substantial heterogeneity in response, because 8 patients showed convincing improvement in BCVA, foveal thickness, or both, 9 patients showed equivocal or no substantial changes, and 4 patients showed worsening. Five patients showed a substantial improvement in BCVA, foveal thickness, or both between their last visit while receiving mecamylamine and 1 month after stopping mecamylamine.

Conclusions

This study suggested that administration of topical mecamylamine, a nonspecific nACh receptor blocker, may have heterogeneous effects in patients with diabetic macular edema. Variable expression of nACh receptor subtypes on endothelial cells that have different effects on permeability would provide an explanation for these results and should be investigated, because more specific nACh receptor blockers may dissociate antipermeability and propermeability effects.

a Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

b Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts

c East Bay Retina Consultants, Boston, Massachusetts

d CoMentis, Inc, South San Francisco, California

e Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Peter A. Campochiaro, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Maumenee 719, Baltimore, MD 21287-9277

PII: S0002-9394(09)00908-8

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.005


View previous. 24 of 38 View next.

Advertisement