American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 5 , Pages 852-860.e1 , May 2010

The Assessment of Disability Related to Vision Performance-Based Measure in Diabetic Retinopathy

  • Kevin J. Warrian

      Affiliations

    • Glaucoma Research Center, William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Kevin J. Warrian, #1406-500 Ridout St N, London ON N6A 0A2, Canada
  • ,
  • Luciano L. Lorenzana

      Affiliations

    • Glaucoma Research Center, William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Dara Lankaranian

      Affiliations

    • Glaucoma Research Center, William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Jyoti Dugar

      Affiliations

    • Glaucoma Research Center, William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Sheryl S. Wizov

      Affiliations

    • Glaucoma Research Center, William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • George L. Spaeth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Jefferson Medical College/William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

,Accepted 12 December 2009.

References 

  1. Yamaoka K, Shigehisa T, Ogoshi K, et al. Health-related quality of life varies with personality types: a comparison among cancer patients, non-cancer patients and healthy individuals in a Japanese population. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:535–544
  2. Kempen GIJM, Jelicic M, Ormel J. Personality, chronic medical comorbidity, and health-related quality of life among older persons. Health Psychol. 1997;16:539–546
  3. Owsley C, McGwin G. Depression and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in older adults. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2259–2264
  4. Feldman PJ, Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Gwaltney JMJ. The impact of personality on the reporting of unfounded symptoms and illness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:370–378
  5. Deary IJ, Scott S, Wilson JA. Neuroticism, alexithymia, and medically unexplained symptoms. Pers Individ Dif. 1997;22:551–564
  6. Massof RW, Fletcher DC. Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision. Vision Res. 2001;41:397–413
  7. Ebert EM, Fine AM, Markowitz J, Maguire MG, Starr JS, Fine SL. Functional vision in patients with neovascular maculopathy and poor visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:1009–1012
  8. Turco PD, Connolly J, McCabe P, Glynn RJ. Assessment of functional vision performance: a new test for low vision patients. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1994;1:15–25
  9. West SK, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults (The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:72–82
  10. McCabe P, Nason F, Demers Turco P, Friedman D, Seddon JM. Evaluating the effectiveness of a vision rehabilitation intervention using an objective and subjective measure of functional performance. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2000;7:259–270
  11. Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. Preliminary investigation of the responsiveness of the Melbourne Low Vision ADL index to low-vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:373–380
  12. Chylack LT, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:991–997
  13. The Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial Research Group. Optic nerve decompression surgery for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is not effective and may be harmful. JAMA. 1995;273:625–632
  14. Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC. Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13:67–80
  15. Lorenzana L, Lankaranian D, Dugar J, et al. A new method of assessing ability to perform activities of daily living: design, methods and baseline data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16:107–114
  16. Warrian KJ, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, Dugar J, Wizov SS, Spaeth GL. Assessing age-related macular degeneration with the ADREV performance-based measure. Retina. 2009;29:80–90
  17. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:227–233
  18. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) (NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators). Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1496–1504
  19. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1050–1058
  20. Klein R, Moss SE, Klein BE, Gutierrez P, Mangione CM. The NEI-VFQ-25 in people with long-term type 1 diabetes mellitus: the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:733–740
  21. Tranos PG, Topouzis F, Stangos NT, et al. Effect of laser photocoagulation treatment for diabetic macular oedema on patient's vision-related quality of life. Curr Eye Res. 2004;29:41–49
  22. Cusick M, SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY, et al. Central visual function and the NEI-VFQ-25 near and distance activities subscale scores in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:1042–1050
  23. Glantz SA. Primer of Biostatistics. 5th ed.. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill; 2002;
  24. Huber PJ. Robust Statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981;
  25. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988;
  26. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987;
  27. Huber M, Rousseeuw PJ. Robust regression with both continuous and binary regressors. J Stat Plan Inference. 1997;57:153–163
  28. Harlow LL. The essence of multivariate thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005;
  29. Marascuilo LA, Levin JR. Multivariate statistics in the social sciences: A research guide. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1983;
  30. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26
  31. Shorack GR. Bootstrapping robust regression. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1982;11:961–972
  32. Thompson B. The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. J Exp Educ. 1993;61:361–377
  33. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170
  34. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth. 2007;39:175–191
  35. Paz SH, Globe DR, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R. Relationship between self-reported depression and self-reported visual function in Latinos. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1021–1027
  36. Haymes SA, Johnston AW, Heyes AD. A weighted version of the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index: a measure of disability impact. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:565–579
  37. Wall M, Jennisch CS. Random dot motion stimuli are more sensitive than light stimuli for detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension patients. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:550–557

PII: S0002-9394(09)00969-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.028

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 149, Issue 5 , Pages 852-860.e1 , May 2010